Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is Demographic segmentation by Income
Explanation:
In marketing Demographic segmentation implies segmentation of the market in groups by certain factors, like for example, race, age, education, income, religion, etc... to exploit the demographics in their advantage this marketing study helps to identify where would a product or service sell more, or where is convenient to open up a business.
Now in this particular case, Deal$ stores are using income segmentation by selling products of a certain (in this case lower) price, the whole attractive of Deal$ stores is the lower price and not the quality of the products sold there, thats why income segmentation is present, because they are literally aiming at one specific kind of customer that wants really low prices.
The Equal Protection Clause is the correct answer.
The equal protection clause, found within the 14th amendment, has the purpose of protecting individuals' rights against discrimination. Under this provision, the same rights, privileges, and protection is guaranteed to all citizens. Therefore, this constitutional clause might be useful to support her case.
Reduced Impact Logging is an example of sustainable logging.
Explanation:
Sustainable logging refers to the logging of mature trees only and leave the small tress for maturing and growth. It is favorable for sustainable environmental conservation and prevention of soil erosion. Cutting of trees loosen the soil particles and make them prone to wash down cause soil erosion.
So, its better to select first the old and mature trees and cut their branches for lumbering. Don't cut randomly all the trees includes newly planted and young trees which strongly hold the soil.
The right-brain vs left-brain theory has lead many people to believe that one side of their brain is dominant over the other. This would mean that they would either be “left-brained” or “right-brained”. Thus attributing to left being rational and right being artistic.
This is like: logical is to artistic
