1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_tiger [21]
2 years ago
6

Is the goverment and communities diong enough to ensure that human rights are protected​

Social Studies
1 answer:
julia-pushkina [17]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

government and community it's self are the mean to rule over country

and community also have a roll to play

in following the laws brought by government

You might be interested in
The Agricultural Adjustment Act that was established in the early days of the New Deal actually paid farmers to plant less cotto
horsena [70]
It boosted there money rate
5 0
2 years ago
Monolingual countries
Andreyy89

Answer:

  • Czech Republic
  • China
  • Spain
  • Russia
  • Italy
3 0
3 years ago
In most states, committee members chosen by who
Yanka [14]
In most states, committee members are chosen by party primaries or conventions.

<span>Although it is up to the parties to decide who may vote in their primaries, generally only regaistered voters affiliated with the Democratic or Republican Parties may vote in that party's primary election.
</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what ways might it be hard to have a uniform law that fits every culture in a multicultural empire?
Andreyy89

Answer:

Multiculturalism

Cultural diversity has been present in societies for a very long time. In Ancient Greece, there were various small regions with different costumes, traditions, dialects and identities, for example, those from Aetolia, Locris, Doris and Epirus. In the Ottoman Empire, Muslims were the majority, but there were also Christians, Jews, pagan Arabs, and other religious groups. In the 21st century, societies remain culturally diverse, with most countries having a mixture of individuals from different races, linguistic backgrounds, religious affiliations, and so forth. Contemporary political theorists have labeled this phenomenon of the coexistence of different cultures in the same geographical space multiculturalism. That is, one of the meanings of multiculturalism is the coexistence of different cultures.

The term ‘multiculturalism’, however, has not been used only to describe a culturally diverse society, but also to refer to a kind of policy that aims at protecting cultural diversity. Although multiculturalism is a phenomenon with a long history and there have been countries historically that did adopt multicultural policies, like the Ottoman Empire, the systematic study of multiculturalism in philosophy has only flourished in the late twentieth century, when it began to receive special attention, especially from liberal philosophers. The philosophers who initially dedicated more time to the topic were mainly Canadian, but in the 21st century it is a widespread topic in contemporary political philosophy. Before multiculturalism became a topic in political philosophy, most literature in this area focused on topics related to the fair redistribution of resources; conversely, the topic of multiculturalism in the realm of political philosophy highlights the idea that cultural identities are also normatively relevant and that policies ought to take these identities into consideration.

To understand the discussion of multiculturalism in contemporary political philosophy, there are four key topics that should be taken into consideration; these are the meaning of the concept of ‘culture’, the meaning of the concept of ‘multiculturalism’, the debate about justice between cultural groups and the discussion regarding the practical implications of multicultural practice.

I don't know if this will help

5 0
3 years ago
One reason for controversy surrounding sentencing decisions in this country is that Americans often a. disagree about the goals
Goshia [24]

The main reason for the controversy surrounding sentencing decisions in America is that its citizen often disagree with the goals of imprisonment.

Basically, a sentencing decision refers to verdicts made by court judge and the options may includes the following:

  • incarceration
  • fine
  • restitution
  • compensation
  • probation etc

However, the main reason for the controversy surrounding sentencing decisions in America is that its citizen often disagree with the goals of imprisonment.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about imprisonment:

<em>brainly.com/question/12408734</em>

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to te fifth Amendment, when is a grand jury indictment required?
    9·1 answer
  • On average, European women are 10 years older than women in sub-Saharan Africa when they have their first baby. Which of the fol
    9·2 answers
  • Name something people believe happens to them after they die family feud
    13·1 answer
  • Professional behavior is comprised of six dimensions, including courtesy and respect, appearance and appeal, tolerance and tact,
    12·1 answer
  • How did Vermont react to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850?
    7·1 answer
  • SALT FLATS OF SAHARA DESERT​
    9·2 answers
  • 3.3<br>Evaluate THREE ways in which employment will minimize emotional stress<br>​
    5·1 answer
  • What did Annemarie and Ellen see on the beach at Uncle Henrik's? (Number the stars)
    8·1 answer
  • How do you think it is possible for a desert to be right<br> next to the ocean?
    9·1 answer
  • Fill in the blank
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!