Hitler's rise to power was an extreme use of propaganda, as the Germans were stuck in the middle of the great depression, and the German government, the Reichswher, a democratic government that was formed at the end of ww1, was paying the allies several million marks to pay of the reparation fines at the treaty of Versailles, but the government printed so much marks, the value of the mark plunged down until a cup of coffee cost hundreds of marks. Hitler used this a propaganda to stir the German people to follow him. Another factor was the elected chancellor on January 30, 1933. Two months after this, The president, Hindenburg, died, and Hitler became chancellor and president, and had all the power of the German government.
Answer:C) social behaviours as a result of genetic factors and natural selection.
Explanation:
Evolutionary psychology is a biological approach that aims to examine human behaviour. It works in close association with cognitive psychologist who explain our behavior as driven by internal psychological mechanism but it only differs by stating that these internal mechanisms are due to adaptations which has resulted from natural selection. These are the adaptations that had helped our ancestors to adjust and reproduce.
Answer:
Check explanation.
Explanation:
A border is a line showing the boundaries between states or countries. So, a border state can be likened to a state that marks the territory of one country. Border States are those states that do not that did not want to join Confederacy, they are also known for their involvement in slave trading. Some of the border states are Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia and so on.
The importance of the location of Maryland border and that of Delaware is that they both contributed to the success of the Union because of their loyalty towards the Union during the war. Also, these border states have good lands for the production of crops, they have fertile land for farming which also contributed immensely during the war.
I believe the answer is: <span>person-situation controversy
</span><span>person-situation controversy refers to a debate in the field of psychology which argue whether a person or the situation play a more crucial factor in determining a person's behavior.
</span>
Experts who support the 'person' side in this controversy believed that people with bad personality traits would always do bad behaviors regardless the situation they're in.
Experts who support the 'situation' side in this controversy believed that bad behaviors only occurs because the people are facing bad situations in their life.
