A strategic alliance is an arrangement between two companies to undertake a mutually beneficial project while each retains its independence.
The agreement is less complex and less binding than a joint venture, in which two businesses pool resources to create a separate business entity.
<h3>What is Joint Venture?</h3>
A joint venture is a child company of two parent companies.
It’s maintained by sharing resources and equity with a binding agreement. Whether it’s formed for a specific purpose or an ongoing strategy, a joint venture has a clear objective, and profits are split between the two companies.
<h3>What is Non – Equity Strategic Alliance?</h3>
In a non-equity strategic alliance, organizations create an agreement to share resources without creating a separate entity or sharing equity.
Non-equity alliances are often more loose and informal than a partnership involving equity. These make up the vast majority of business alliances.
Learn more about strategic alliances here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/19474063</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
I’m not sure how to help you.
Answer:
The answer is: A) is the sum of all individual demand curves.
Explanation:
By definition the market curve is the sum of all individual demand curves in a market. It shows the total quantity of goods that consumers demand (are willing and able to purchase) at varying price points. Usually the curve shows a downward slope since consumer demand decreases as the price of a good increases.
This statement is false.
Conversion and direct materials are generally both not added at the end of the production process. As a matter of fact, they are either added at the beginning, or in the middle of the process, but definitely not at the end because then it would be too late.
Answer:
The answer is: C) lose because he will not be able to prove reliance on the misrepresentation.
Explanation:
In order for Larson to be able to rescind the contract, he would have to prove that he had reasonable reliance that Robert Redford owned that specific car. Reasonable reliance refers to a person believing something to be a fact, which any other person could reasonably believe in as well.
But exactly how could he prove that someone else might also believe that the car was previously owned by Robert Redford? I find it very doubtful that he can prove that.