Answer:
Corporate Social Responsibility or CSR.
Explanation:
To put it simply, Corporate Social Responsibility means that a company is concerned and responsible about how their actions affect People, Planet and their Profits (3 P's)
Following are the generally accepted principles of CSR.
- Compliance with international commitments
- Compliance with international and national laws and regulations
- Maintenance of good corporate governance
- Communication and dialog with all stakeholders
- Commitment to Transparency
- Conservation and the promotion of the Environment
- Fiscal responsibility
- Protecting Human Rights
- Promotion of Social responsibility
Answer:
The correct answer is b. equality is increased and efficiency is decreased.
Explanation:
Progressive taxes are considered those in which the economic capacity of the person or the company is taken into account, that is: the higher the economic capacity the value to be paid for the tax increases. The objective of this type of taxes is that the payments made by people or companies are made proportionally to their income. Direct taxes are usually progressive.
An example of a progressive tax is the income tax, in the case of natural persons the value to be paid for this concept depends on the taxable liquid income.
Answer: Limited liability company
Explanation:
In such a structure the owners and the firm are considered separate. The owners in a LLC could not be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of their company.
The companies have the limited liability feature of the corporations while the profit distribution method depicts partnership structure.
In the given case, Toby and Keith wants to distribute profit among them and also do not want to raise any outside capital. Also they want limited liability in their organisation.
Hence a Limited liability company is an appropriate choice for them.
Answer:
LIFO. usually results in a balance sheet valuation of inventory farthest away from its economic value. LIFO. would result in the highest after-tax cash flow in periods of rising prices and non-decreasing levels of inventory.
smort doggo is off to another question
Explanation:
The long-running debate between the ‘rational design’ and ‘emergent process’ schools of strategy formation has involved caricatures of firms' strategic planning processes, but little empirical evidence of whether and how companies plan. Despite the presumption that environmental turbulence renders conventional strategic planning all but impossible, the evidence from the corporate sector suggests that reports of the demise of strategic planning are greatly exaggerated. The goal of this paper is to fill this empirical gap by describing the characteristics of the strategic planning systems of multinational, multibusiness companies faced with volatile, unpredictable business environments. In-depth case studies of the planning systems of eight of the world's largest oil companies identified fundamental changes in the nature and role of strategic planning since the end of the 1970s. The findings point to a possible reconciliation of ‘design’ and ‘process’ approaches to strategy formulation. The study pointed to a process of planned emergence in which strategic planning systems provided a mechanism for coordinating decentralized strategy formulation within a structure of demanding performance targets and clear corporate guidelines. The study shows that these planning systems fostered adaptation and responsiveness, but showed limited innovation and analytical sophistication
