Answer: (e.) The same pay as either a professor or as a chief economist at the Humane Society.
Explanation:
The correct answer would be <u>option (e)</u> because in this case there lies an ambiguity i.e. we are uncertain about skillets that an economists should be endowed with or for being a faculty member.
Therefore , it can be concluded that he would get at least as good pay as being faculty. In both cases he'll be better off.
<span>A fast-food restaurant decides to raise the price of its hamburgers. assume the firm is in a monopolistically competitive industry. what will happen to the demand for its hamburgers? When the fast-food restaurant raises the price of hamburgers, some customers may stay and pay the higher price because they want that specific brand of hamburgers, other may go elsewhere to find them cheaper.
When prices raise, some customers stay because they are attached to that specific company, others leave because they want a burger but for a lower price.
</span>
A.limited supply hope that helps
Answer and Explanation:
The disagreement arise between this economist is due to the differences in the scientific judgements as they disagree due to the various scientific judgements. And, despite their differences, the proposition of two economists should be chosen at random as the tariff and import quotas normally decreased the economic welfare as it always result in deadweight loss and in this both economist should be agree for the same
Answer:
(a) 3.7
(b) 3.7
Explanation:
The unemployment rate is calculated as the ration of unemployed workers over the labor force. The labor force is the total number of employed plus unemployed workers:
Then if there were 155 million people in the labor force and 7.4% where unemployed that means that 11.47 million people where unemployed
If unemployment rate would have been 5% we have
That means that 3.72 million fewer unemployed workers. Since Labor Force is the sum of unemployed and employed workers. The reduction in unemployment implies that they were now employed .
