This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
I believe the answer is: <span>reacting to different sexual scripts
Sexual scripts refers to the things that males and females expected to do when they want to initiate sexual intercourse with one another.
In the scenario above, even though breast touching is often happened during sexual intercourse, the wife acknowledge the doctor's touching as a professional effort to check her health, not to initiate intercoursse</span><span />
Answer:
Because we have mind to do social things. We developed according to our social environment.
Because we have mind to do social things. We developed according to our social environment.If you see history all the civilizations are developed socially it means a man is born to be social. We learn from others. Even animals are social to lI've life safer the rules are equally applicable to them.
If you compete with one another, it will be ineffective because you want to solve the problem, not make it worse. Whoever you're conflicting with will never listen to you if you continuously clash and you won't be able to do anything properly that way.
Hope that helped you.
<span>The correct answer is safety <span>needs.
Michael is likely dreading that he will be laid off and lose his job next since several other employees at his organization have already been laid off. Due to this his need for security (stability and safety) is heightened.</span></span>
