1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
crimeas [40]
2 years ago
8

How did the Supreme Court rule in Worcester v. Georgia?

Social Studies
1 answer:
shutvik [7]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: The states had no right to impose regulations on Native American territory.

Explanation:

Samuel A. Worcester was part of a white Christian missionary group living in Cherokee territory in Georgia that advised the natives to resist the state´s effort to impose state laws on them. Worcester was arrested, trialed, and sentenced for his actions, but he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that Georgia had no right to impose its laws on Cherokee territory.

The Supreme Court agreed with his claim, holding Georgia laws regarding the Cherokee Nation unconstitutional and therefore invalid.

You might be interested in
For Rome, which was the MOST serious consequence of the invasion of the Huns?
Liono4ka [1.6K]

The correct answer is C. The Huns devastated large parts of the Roman Empire.

Although they did not conquer the territory of the empire, the devastation that they caused made other Germanic peoples could enter without major efforts, which in the end was the cause of the fall of the Western Roman Empire.

8 0
3 years ago
Which amendment guards against excessive punishment if a person is convicted of a crime? Answer Choices:A.
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

I guess so, that is my final answer

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was the last state in the united states that declared christmas a legal holiday
n200080 [17]
The last state to officially recognize Christmas was Oklahoma when it joined the union in 1907.
5 0
2 years ago
Ward is attempting to introduce oral evidence in an action relating to a written contract between Ward and Weaver. Weaver has pl
Julli [10]

Answer:

A change in the meaning of an unambiguous provision in the contract

Explanation:

The main aim of the pleading the parol evidence rule is to ensure that a party is prevented from any introduction of evidence of oral agreements made before the contract was agreed or in the process of reducing the agreement to its final form for the purpose of altering the existing terms in the current contract. Hence Weaver pleading the parol evidence rule ensures that Ward does not introduce parol evidence as long as it relates to a change in any of the provisions in the contract.

5 0
3 years ago
What religious group gained control of the New Jersey colony?
Savatey [412]
So, in March 1673 Berkeley sold his part of the colony to the Quakers. After the sale to the Quakers the colony was divided into two East and West Jersey. That political division lasted between 1674 and 1702. New Jersey was home to many religious denominations with the Dutch Reformed Church being one of the largest.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Jennifer Burroughs is thinking about starting a firm in the upscale women's fashion industry. To get a full appreciation of the
    5·1 answer
  • How do new ideas change the way people live?
    10·2 answers
  • Middle childhood is the _____.
    6·1 answer
  • What was the great compromise
    10·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP ME OUT WITH THESE QUESTIONS THERE DUE TODAY!!! AND STRESS OUT AGAIN PLZ HELP!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Which child is best described as an "average child"?
    12·1 answer
  • 18. What is dependence?
    9·1 answer
  • For what reason did Georgia's capital city change over time? 0 Voters kept choosing a different city to be the capital. Voters i
    9·1 answer
  • What famous cookie is named after a suburb of boston?.
    9·1 answer
  • How did the US intervene in Cuban Revolution?.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!