1 can be interpreted as a "whole" thing, and smaller than 1 is a part of a thing.
imagine: if you have some cakes and you count the number of cake pieces, those will be more than the number of cakes: as each cake will have more than one piece! (otherwise it wouldn't be called a piece!)
so the result of a division by a fraction is bigger than the original number, there are more parts than wholes in the results, as each whole has multiple parts!
for example: divide 3 cakes into pieces which are 1/4th of a cake. how many such pieces would there be? 12! more than the 3 original cakes;
is this possible to understand? tell me if not!
Answer:
y=2.50+175*(x-1)
$4727.50
Step-by-step explanation:
y=2.50+175*(x-1)
The first km costs 2.50 which is why you add it. You do x-1 because the 175 is charged for each additional km. So, if you traveled one km it would cost 2.50.
y=2.5+175*(28-1)
y=2.5+175*27
y=2.5+4725
y=$4727.50
Answer:
144
Step-by-step explanation:
36 x 4
Answer:
E: None of the above
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
The objective is to find out how much time it takes people to commute to work.
Two samples where taken and two hypothesis tests where made:
One:
Sample mean 71 min; p-value: 0.03
Two:
Sample mean 72 min; p-value: 0.06
You have to choose from the options, a possible pair of hypotheses used for these two tests.
The parameter of the study is the population mean μ.
In the statistic hypotheses, the parameters are given either a known population value or a suspected value. So all options including sample values are wrong.
As said before the objective of the survey is to "determine how much time people spend commuting to work" in other words, whether or not the population mean is equal to a certain value.
H₀: μ = μ₀
H₁: μ = μ₀
Where μ₀ represents the theoretical value of the population mean. As you can say the hypotheses pair is two-tailed, not one-tailed.
Then the correct answer is E: None of the above
I hope this helps!
