Answer: 0.8238
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : Scores on a certain intelligence test for children between ages 13 and 15 years are approximately normally distributed with
and
.
Let x denotes the scores on a certain intelligence test for children between ages 13 and 15 years.
Then, the proportion of children aged 13 to 15 years old have scores on this test above 92 will be :-
![P(x>92)=1-P(x\leq92)\\\\=1-P(\dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}\leq\dfrac{92-106}{15})\\\\=1-P(z\leq })\\\\=1-P(z\leq-0.93)=1-(1-P(z\leq0.93))\ \ [\because\ P(Z\leq -z)=1-P(Z\leq z)]\\\\=P(z\leq0.93)=0.8238\ \ [\text{By using z-value table.}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x%3E92%29%3D1-P%28x%5Cleq92%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D1-P%28%5Cdfrac%7Bx-%5Cmu%7D%7B%5Csigma%7D%5Cleq%5Cdfrac%7B92-106%7D%7B15%7D%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D1-P%28z%5Cleq%20%7D%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D1-P%28z%5Cleq-0.93%29%3D1-%281-P%28z%5Cleq0.93%29%29%5C%20%5C%20%5B%5Cbecause%5C%20P%28Z%5Cleq%20-z%29%3D1-P%28Z%5Cleq%20z%29%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3DP%28z%5Cleq0.93%29%3D0.8238%5C%20%5C%20%5B%5Ctext%7BBy%20using%20z-value%20table.%7D%5D)
Hence, the proportion of children aged 13 to 15 years old have scores on this test above 92 = 0.8238
Answer:
22
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that T is the midpoint of line PQ, segments PT = 5x + 2, and TQ = 7x - 6 that are formed would be equidistant or congruent. PT = TQ.
Therefore:

Let's find the value of x
Rearrange the equation, so that the terms having x would be on your left, while those without x would be on your right.


Divide both sides by -2

Plug in the value of x into the expression, 5x + 2, to find PT.
PT = 5(4) + 2 = 22.
-22 belongs to the set of Integers, rational numbers
Answer:
The result of the integration is 
Step-by-step explanation:
Integration of a power of x:
The integration of a power of x is:

In this question:
. So

The result of the integration is 
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
On a number line, the 0 is in the middle. Positive numbers are to the right of the 0 and negative numbers are to the left of the 0. A point farthest from 0 could be on the left side and therefore be really small. Therefore the point farthest from 0 is not always the greatest as it could also be the smallest