The type of government Alexander the Great lived in should be:
<span>absolute monarchy.</span>
Lee pido buscadores digitales funcion
The Middle Ages as a time culturally dominated by religion, casting a shadow over the arts and sciences, preventing them from flourishing freely. This idea considered the Middle Ages to be the Dark Ages.
The word middle indicates something that is in an intermediate position. For the eighteenth-century thinkers known as the Enlightenment, this period of history was between Classical Antiquity, ended with the conquest of Rome by the Heruli in 476, and the Modern Age, of which they were a part, beginning with the conquest of city of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks in 1453.
This was a way of looking at the world based on European history, disregarding the other regions of the planet. This kind of thinking was called Eurocentrism because it placed the European continent as the center of analysis. These eighteenth-century thinkers disregarded what had happened in other regions of the planet, such as the Islamic Empire, the Americas, or even China.
Moreover, during the Renaissance, it was conventionally called the Middle Ages of the Dark Ages because the Renaissance placed itself as heirs of thought and science developed by the Greeks and Romans, reviving the culture of antiquity. For the Renaissance, during the Middle Ages, the arts and sciences, compared to antiquity, had declined. The responsibility for this would be largely the Catholic Church, which dominated Europe politically, economically and culturally at the time. Religious domination would have impeded the development of reason, creating an era of backwardness and primitivism.
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
Answer:
Lobbying
Explanation:
Lobbying have to do with an interest group trying to influence legislatures stand or opinion on issues that will affect them.
Small interest groups can effectively utilize the tools of lobbying to pass legislatures that will favour them and give them political powers. They will most likely not be able to sway votes or public opinions since they are a minority thus lobbying is an option that can be fully utilized.
