All categories

1 year ago

What is the difference between 89.4 and 13.621 do not round your answer

Mathematics

1 answer:

Svetllana [295]1 year ago

5 0

Answer:

89.4 - 13.621 = 75.779

Explanation:

Subtract 13.621 from 89.4 to get 75.779.

You might be interested in

GUYS CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME? Write an equation for each word problem.

svp [43]

1. 584x3=1752
2. 90/2=45. 45-3=42. 45+3=48. Madison has $48 and Saul has $42.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help 20 points

12345 [234]

Answer:

x =± (√ 317/ 2 )+( 15 /2)

6 0

3 years ago

Trisha had a bowling score of 126 for the first game. She had a score of 97 for the second game.

NeTakaya

Answer:

23% decrease

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Lagrange multipliers have a definite meaning in load balancing for electric network problems. Consider the generators that can o

Ivahew [28]

Answer:

The load balance $(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(545.5,272.7,181.8)$ Mw minimizes the total cost

Step-by-step explanation:

Optimizing With Lagrange Multipliers

When a multivariable function f is to be maximized or minimized, the Lagrange multipliers method is a pretty common and easy tool to apply when the restrictions are in the form of equalities.

Consider three generators that can output xi megawatts, with i ranging from 1 to 3. The set of unknown variables is x1, x2, x3.

The cost of each generator is given by the formula

$\displaystyle C_i=3x_i+\frac{i}{40}x_i^2$

It means the cost for each generator is expanded as

$\displaystyle C_1=3x_1+\frac{1}{40}x_1^2$

$\displaystyle C_2=3x_2+\frac{2}{40}x_2^2$

$\displaystyle C_3=3x_3+\frac{3}{40}x_3^2$

The total cost of production is

$\displaystyle C(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3x_1+\frac{1}{40}x_1^2+3x_2+\frac{2}{40}x_2^2+3x_3+\frac{3}{40}x_3^2$

Simplifying and rearranging, we have the objective function to minimize:

$\displaystyle C(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+\frac{1}{40}(x_1^2+2x_2^2+3x_3^2)$

The restriction can be modeled as a function g(x)=0:

$g: x_1+x_2+x_3=1000$

$g(x_1,x_2,x_3)= x_1+x_2+x_3-1000$

We now construct the auxiliary function

$f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=C(x_1,x_2,x_3)-\lambda g(x_1,x_2,x_3)$

$\displaystyle f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+\frac{1}{40}(x_1^2+2x_2^2+3x_3^2)-\lambda (x_1+x_2+x_3-1000)$

We find all the partial derivatives of f and equate them to 0

$\displaystyle f_{x1}=3+\frac{2}{40}x_1-\lambda=0$

$\displaystyle f_{x2}=3+\frac{4}{40}x_2-\lambda=0$

$\displaystyle f_{x3}=3+\frac{6}{40}x_3-\lambda=0$

$f_\lambda=x_1+x_2+x_3-1000=0$

Solving for \lambda in the three first equations, we have

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{2}{40}x_1$

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{4}{40}x_2$

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{6}{40}x_3$

Equating them, we find:

$x_1=3x_3$

$\displaystyle x_2=\frac{3}{2}x_3$

Replacing into the restriction (or the fourth derivative)

$x_1+x_2+x_3-1000=0$

$\displaystyle 3x_3+\frac{3}{2}x_3+x_3-1000=0$

$\displaystyle \frac{11}{2}x_3=1000$

$x_3=181.8\ MW$

And also

$x_1=545.5\ MW$

$x_2=272.7\ MW$

The load balance $(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(545.5,272.7,181.8)$ Mw minimizes the total cost

5 0

3 years ago

Order the following in descending order -3/4, 1/8, -0.735, 7/8, 1/80, 0.056

Vilka [71]

If you would like to order the following values in descending order, you can do this using the following steps:

- 3/4 = - 0.75
1/8 = 0.125
- 0.735
7/8 = 0.875
1/80 = 0.0125
0.056

The result is: 7/8, 1/8, 0.056, 1/80, - 0.735, -0.75.

5 0

3 years ago

What is the difference between 89.4 and 13.621 do not round your answer￼

What is the difference between 89.4 and 13.621 do not round your answer