Answer:
that depens am i going to regreat it or not?
Explanation:
Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
Answer:
The correct option is C. which is <em>assess how long a company with positive cash flows from financing activities can continue to operate</em>
Explanation:
<em>The ratio of cash to monthly cash expenses can be used to make assessment of a company whether how long it can determine without additional financing and positive cash flows generated from operations.</em>
The formula of The ratio of cash to monthly cash expenses
= Cash s of year end ÷ Monthly Cash Expenses
Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
