All categories

3 years ago

identify the early developments in europe as having either contributed or not contributed to the rise of industrial wage labor.

Business

1 answer:

dolphi86 [110]3 years ago

7 0

Some developments that contributed to the increase in salaried work in Europe were:

Factory growth
Devaluation of agricultural and manual work
Displacement from rural to urban areas

Industrialization in Europe was a process that began in the 18th century with the industrial revolution. This event was promoted by some social, economic and cultural aspects that allowed the overcrowding of the industry such as:

Factory growth: Factory owners increased the supply of products and people increased the demand for which it was necessary to found new factories and hire more salaried labor.

Devaluation of agricultural and manual work: With the development of machines, products produced manually were devalued because it was more profitable to manufacture large quantities of a single product with the help of machines than in the traditional way. This caused many artisans to be employed in the factories.

Displacement: When agricultural work stopped being profitable for many families, they had to emigrate to the big cities and work in industrial factories to survive.

Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing. However, I can answer it based on my prior knowledge and general knowledge.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/18745839

You might be interested in

The law that regulates the offering and sale of purely intrastate securities is known as the:

qaws [65]

Blue-Sky Laws

_Danielle_

4 0

3 years ago

Given the following financial structure for Company S for all of 2016:

Mila [183]

Answer:

Explanation:

A.)

The Basic EPS can be determined by using the formula:

$\mathtt{Basic \ EPS = \dfrac{Net \ income \ attributabe \ to\ common \ stock \ holders }{\text{common stock outstanding throughout the year}} }$

$\text{Given Net income = \$2,600,000}$

$\text{Net income available for common stock holders = }$ $\text{ Net income given less dividend}$

$\text{ to preferred holders of stock}$

$\mathtt{=$2,600,000 - $100 \times 50000\times 6\%}$

$=\$2,300,000$

$\text{Common stock} = $800,000$

∴

$\mathbf{Basic \ EPS = \dfrac{\$2,300,000}{800,000} }$

$\mathbf{Basic \ EPS = \$2.88 \ per \ common \ stock}$

B.)

The calculations for the numerator and denominator effect are:

$\text{Calculation of the effect on incremental EPS}$

Convertible on preferred stock $\mathtt{=\dfrac{500,000 \times 100 \times 6\%}{50000\times 5}}$

$=1.20$

Convertible Bond $=\dfrac{500,000 \times 8\%\times 70\%}{\dfrac{500,000}{1000\times 20}}$

= 2.80

Stock options $= \dfrac{0}{100,000- (100,000\times \dfrac{60}{80})}$

= 0

Determination of the numerator & denominator effect for each convertible securities shown above are:

Numerator (N) Denominator (D) Dilution index = N/D

Net income $2,600,000

Less: Preferred $300000

Dividend

Common stock A

Net income $2,300,000 800,000 2.875

Add: Stock

Options (B) 0 25000

Total (C) = (A + B) $2300000 825000 2.788

Add: Convertible

Bonds (D) 428000 10000

Total (E) = (C+D) $2328000 835000 2.787

Add: Convertible

Preferred Stock (F) $300000 250000

Total (E) + (F) $2628000 1085000 2.422

C.)

Particulars Dilutive Index Rank (most dilutive is 1.)

Stock Option 2.788 1

Convertible Bonds 2.787 3

Preferred Stock 2.422 2

D.)

From above, the convertibles are diluted EPS (DEPS)

$\text{ DEPS =Net income available common stockholders + net tax dividend on convertible securities}$ ÷ $\text{weighted average no. of common shares + effect of convertible stock + convertible stock options}$

$\text{DEPS (1{st} stage) for only common stock}= \dfrac{2300000}{800000} = \$2.88}$

$\text{DEPS (2{st} stage)with \ stock \ options}= \dfrac{2300000+0}{800000+25000} = \$2.788}$

$\text{DEPS (3{st} stage)with \ stock \ options \& preferred \ stock }= \dfrac{2300000+300000+0}{800000+250000+25000} = \$2.42}$

3 0

3 years ago

A. compute the basic earnings per share b. compute the diluted earnings per share

Nookie1986 [14]

It is compute the dilutes earnings per share. I think it’s B.

8 0

3 years ago

Sally is employed as a computer programmer for the Ellis Corporation. She has a savings account of $15,000 and owns a few shares

Bess [88]

Marx would maintain that Sally has experienced false class consciousness.

Explanation:

False class consciousness is the term used to describe the behavior of the employees who identify themselves as investors by mistake when they own few shares of stock or work as managers in large corporations. This term false class consciousness was used by famous sociologist Karl Marx.

In the above scenario, Sally was working for Ellis Corporation as a computer programmer. But she thinks herself as a stockholder as she holds few shares of Ellis stock and had $15,000 in her savings account.

5 0

3 years ago

You are a U.S.-based treasurer with $1,000,000 to invest. The dollar-euro exchange rate is quoted as $1.60 = €1.00 and the dolla

never [62]

Answer:

$41,667

Explanation:

First and foremost, in order to profit from the arbitrage opportunity, we need to first of all convert dollars to euro using the exchange rate below

$1.60 = €1.00

$1,000,000 in euros= $1,000,000*€1.00/$1.60=€625,000

Next we convert the euros to pounds using the rate quoted by the bank below:

£1.00 = €1.20

€625,000 in pounds=€625,000*£1.00/€1.20=£ 520,833.33

Lastly, we convert the pounds sterling back to dollars using the below exchange rate

$2.00 = £1.00

£ 520,833.33 in dollars=£ 520,833.33*$2/£1.00=$ 1,041,666.67

Profit from the arbitrage=$ 1,041,666.67 -$1,000,000.00

Profit from the arbitrage=$41,667(rounded to a whole dollar amount)

8 0

3 years ago