Answer:
Plato believed that the aristocracy would allow only people with the right intellect to rule the country efficiently. He believed that aristocracy was the combination of wisdom and virtue and that this is reserved for only a limited number of noble citizens who have full access to the highest quality education.
Explanation:
The aristocracy is a way of establishing a national government through specific people in society who would have all the power of governance in a country. These people would be chosen through noble lineage and wealth.
Aristoteles and Plato were great supporters of these systems, as they believed that only people with full access to quality education would have sufficient ethical and moral intellect to be a head of government. Only nobles had this access.
These philosophers believed that the aristocracy was much better than democracy, because democracy gave freedom to anyone to stand for political office, in addition to allowing people who had no access to education and therefore a "low intellect" to choose those who would represent the government.
Although today, some people believe that the aristocracy is a good form of government, we know that it is not right to believe that. This is because keeping a country's governance power in the hands of a single family, where the post of head of state is chosen through a lineage is very dangerous.
Democracy allows us to remove tyrannical and inefficient leaders from power and choose that candidate who represents ideas that will benefit the country and lead its people to advance.
Answer:
Confederates had small advantages because they were close to home which meant they had quick access to supplies and familiarity of the battlegrounds. BUT OVERALL the industrialized Union possessed an enormous advantage over the Confederacy — they had 20,000 miles of railroad track, more than double the Confederacy’s 9,000 miles. Troops and supplies that were previously dependent on man or horse power could now move easily by rail, making railroads attractive military targets. The Union controlled 70% of the country’s total miles of track and owned 96% of U.S. railroad equipment, which meant it was ideally prepared for damage replacement when bridges, rail rights-of-way or rolling stock were destroyed. This strength was an early indicator of rail’s ability to shape future military strategy.
Explanation:
Hope this helped! Brainiest please if it did
The correct answer is <em><u>option B. She does not have a finance degree</u></em>. A financial service sales agent is someone who is in charge of contacting potential buyers and clients in order to sell them commodities or securities. They also work as advisers within the company, to attract more investors from the financial market.
In order to land a job as a financial service agent, the candidate is expected to hold a bachelor's degree, and most of the big companies looking to hire a financial service sales agent are looking for people that have a degree in either finance, accounting or economy. This is probably why Beth is having difficulties landing a job as a financial agent, if she would have a degree in finance or a similar subject, she would be a better fit for the role.
The answer is "On several occasions" because it gives an example of its hunting skills afterwards
Answer: True
Explanation: A social problem is an issue that affects and influences many individuals within a society. Such issues include child abuse, homelessness, hunger, gender discrimination and so on. Functionalism is a sociological theory based on the premise that society is a complex system and all its various parts work together to promote stability and solidarity.
Functionalism therefore views social problems as occurring when society has not yet caught up to the expectations of norms and values that would promote the social consolidation and stability of such social system. This theory believes that an impact in one part of society will impact another part, for example, it should be expected that extreme poverty will inadvertently lead to higher crime rates in a bid for the poor to fend for themselves.
