Answer:
The answer is D) None of these statement is relevant in the decision to further process the cream into butter.
Explanation:
option A) the amount paid to the farmers to purchase the unprocessed milk: this information is not relevant to further develop the cream and low fat milk to butter. It was already considered before this stage of production.
Option B) the cost of breaking down the unprocessed milk into cream and low-fat milk: this cost was already accounted for since the processing into cream and low fat milk is completed.
Option C) the portion of corporate fixed expenses that are currently being allocated to cream: This information is not going to help in the decision making for further processing.
Answer:
9.11
xplanation:㏒
The coinsurance amount is 9.11.
Birthday of the dependent child is 1939-1945.
Date to play a claim is 1914-1918
Primary and secondary policy holders is 7/11.
<h2>Hope this helps! (: STAY SAFE AND BLESSED </h2>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because there are plenty of suppliers for some goods, the food truck owner is more powerful in this case than the suppliers. Here the power of suppliers is low
For the other goods with only a single supplier. the supplier has more powerful than the taco seller. here the power of supplier is high. If the supplier increases price, the taco seller would most likely have an inelastic demand and would be at the mercy of the supplier
thus, the power of suppliers is relatively high for some items and relatively low for others.
<span>An allergic reaction should not be treated
lightly because this can actually result in death of the victim. So in this
casem this could actually lead to serious illness or death of the customer.
Which adds a very huge liability for the restaurant or organization.</span>
