1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
V125BC [204]
1 year ago
6

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde

n of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?
Law
1 answer:
BigorU [14]1 year ago
5 0

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ  the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Private prisons are more economically efficient than government-run facilities.
muminat
False is your answer
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about a theory is true?
lys-0071 [83]
D makes more sense so try D
3 0
2 years ago
How does thermal imaging technology help law enforcement when conducting a building search
andreyandreev [35.5K]
Thermal imaging detect heat therefore enabling law enforcement professionals to see in complete darkness.
8 0
3 years ago
true or false that many modern rights result from.supreme court interpretations of the u.s. constitution brainly
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
The Answer Is False That Is Not True .
6 0
2 years ago
What technique is thought to be solidly scientific? Why?
leva [86]

Answer:

The one forensic science that is thought to be solidly scientific is DNA.

Explanation:

DNA analysis was developed by medical science, unlike other forensic sciences that were developed by law enforcement, which is why it is a trusted science without a question of doubt.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • James is a lawyer who is representing a victim of domestic abuse in a case presided over by Judge Danner. During an unofficial c
    9·1 answer
  • My discord is<br><br> #1864<br><br> If anyone wants to friend me
    15·1 answer
  • James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc. Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. Whil
    11·1 answer
  • Lethal force is limited to the use of a firearm.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    11·2 answers
  • Is there a grandfather clause for the new tobacco law
    14·2 answers
  • What is an advantage of photographing animals at the zoo rather than the wild?
    13·1 answer
  • The most popular mortgage that has a fixed interest rate and<br> a loan period of thirty years?
    15·1 answer
  • How many amendments are there in the bill of rights?.
    14·1 answer
  • Idioms and their meanings
    8·1 answer
  • Does spending the most money usually result in an election victory?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!