Answer:
NO
Explanation:
Al-Dabagh, a dermatologist, was said to have completed all the academic requirements at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) for him to become a medical doctor. They school did not give him the required certificate with series of cases brought against him for being unprofessional in his conducts.
Many times, he was found late, and that delayed the classes on several occasions. There are also times he was said to have put up inappropriate acts with some girls in his class and in another incidence, it was said that he rode on a cab and refused to pay afterwards. Though he denied all these, but that did not convince the university to shift ground.
There was a trial court judgment that he should be given the certificate he merited. CWRU decided to appeal the case further and the supreme court reversed the judgement made by the trial court, reaffirming the stance of the university.
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
Answer: I think the answer is all of the choices
Explanation:
Biden 2020, trump will make people lose their jobs not Biden
