Answer:
The simple answer is yes a female should be paid the same, but often this is not the case.
Explanation:
Morally, yes a female with the same qualifications and experience should be paid the same salary as the counterpart prior to her, though it is not a law that there can't be a wage gap between women and men and this is most commonly not a reality. Women are often paid less than men with the same degree, qualifications, and experience, especially if the woman is part of a racial minority, or in a male dominated industry. Often, employers are able to find loopholes and reasons, "justifying" this unjust wage gap.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
An opening statement forecasts to the jury the evidence they will see and hear during the trial—it allows the jury to know what to expect and to be able to understand the evidence when it is presented.
(please give brainliest)
Answer:
2003) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. ... The Estate of Melvin Ballantyne and the executrix, Jean Ballantyne ... it generated; however, by virtue of the arrangement to pay one-half of ... The court noted that a partner must take into account his "distributive share" for each item of
Explanation:
Edge 2020
As the prosecuting attorney, your role is to defend the defendant in regards to the case and even if they had committed a crime, you have to make sure that they are not proven guilty or they are acquitted.
To some extent, the level of crime or crime type matter because some prosecuting attorney will let their clients go if it a petty crime but when it is a crime such as murder, misappropriation of funds, they may never compromise.
<h3>What is this case about?</h3>
If you known that it is a huge crime and your conscience cannot allow you to let the man go so that he will not do it again, you can tell the opposition lawyer anonymously but this may jeopardize your law career if caught.
The right thing to do is to step down from been the prosecuting attorney and then you can be free from that guilt of betrayal to yourself and to the defendant and then one can properly submit the evidence to the opposition lawyer.
Learn more about prosecuting attorney from
brainly.com/question/11589445
#SPJ1
Answer:
According to the Supreme Ruling of 1988 in the case between <em>California v. Greenwood</em>, it was decided that the 4th amendment to the United States constitution does not permit Law Enforcement Agents to seize or search garbage that a suspect left outside of his or her residence without a warrant.
The court's initial argument was that if an individual put out their garbage outside of their house, and in the public, knowing that anyone and or anything could tamper with or rummage it, then there was no reason for such an individual to expect the Law Enforcement Agents to provide a warrant prior to searching such garbage.
Justice Brennan in a counter-argument stated whilst it was true that anyone could have accessed the garbage without the owner's consent, snooping around such behaviour was not exactly one that was reasonably expected of civilised people.
Cheers
