Although the impact on the equilibrium quantity cannot be determined, a rise in demand and a decrease in supply will result in an increase in the equilibrium price. 1. Consumers now place a higher value on goods, and producers must charge a higher price to offer the goods; as a result, prices will rise for all quantities.
If demand increases at the same time as supply increases, as is the case in the scenario depicted, the new equilibrium price will be greater than the initial equilibrium price.
We therefore know that an increase in supply decreases equilibrium price and increases quantity, while a rise in supply increases equilibrium price and decreases quantity (and vice versa) (and vice versa).
To learn more on equilibrium price
brainly.com/question/14480835
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>Labour rate variance = $260 favourable</em>
Explanation:
<em>The rate variance would be the difference between the standard labour cost of the 2,300 units sold and the actual labour cost</em>
Standard labour cost (3600/1200× 2300)<em> 6,900</em>
<em>Actual labour cost </em><u><em>6, 640</em></u>
<em>labour rate variance </em><u><em> $260</em></u><em> favourable</em>
The variance is favourable because the StuckinMyHouse book company saved $260 as a result of of his actual cost been less than the expected cost.
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
Product A is a variable cost because variable cost(inputs) increases(decreases) with increase (decrease) units(output).
Whereas for product B;
Though, fixed cost is fixed across all units of output but as the total output increases, the average fixed cost decreases because the same amount of fixed costs now cover a larger number of output produced.
Products whose demand rises when another product's price increases are called: Substitute goods
Answer:
50
Explanation:
According to the question, The computation of the quantity produce is shown below:
Here we use the differentiation LRAC to zero

From above calculation it can be concluded that the each firm would be produced the quantity of long run equilibrium for 50
Hence, the first option is correct