Answer:
Business markets and consumer-goods markets differ in relation to the consumer and the form of operation. Business markets are formed by companies that provide products or services for other companies to manufacture their final products and services. Consumer goods markets, on the other hand, refer to companies that produce products and services already intended for final consumers.
The difference between them is that in business markets there are some significant advantages that reduce competitiveness, such as the creation of a long-term relationship with the customer, since the impact of buying and selling is greater, which also ensures greater stability business, since companies need constant inputs and services for their production of products and services to sell to the final consumer.
The utmost effective
audit procedure for determining the collectability of an account receivable is
the, review of the subsequent cash collections. Reviewing the subsequent cash
collections speeds up the audit procedure to determine the collectability of an
account receivable.
<span> </span>
Answer:
(C) Pepin The Short
Explanation:
In 741AD, Pepin took over from his father as Mayor of the Palace. He ruled alongside his elder brother.
In 743AD, Pepin and his brother chose Childeric to be the <em>apparent</em> King of the Franks. Both brothers still wielded the functional power to the throne. Childeric was just to 'appear to be' the King (unknown to him though).
In 747AD, Pepin's brother stepped down (intentionally and on his own accord). Pepin then became the only ruler of the entire Frankish territory.
In 751AD, Pepin, without full support from his clan, lured Childeric into monastery in order to remove him as the 'face of Francia'.
Pope Zacharias helped Pepin to be proclaimed King of the Franks, against all opposition.
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
