One way settlers can get land is that they can declare war against the ones who are on the land.by declaring war they would have to win the war. the second way they could get land is by making a trade like we've done in the past. we would have to make some kind of big trade w/ the ones who are on the land. like goods that's important to them. the third way we could get land is by making a treaty w/ our enemy too. that's by saying that we will never to invade or come near there land ever again. and the last one is by just killing everyone on the land and then claiming it. by that you will need a big boom.
forensic anthropologist Karen burns investigated alleged atrocities in northern Iraq following the 1991 gulf war. she established that one individual was murdered (and not buried by his family) simply through evidence of two polyester threads attached to his legs.
<h3>Who is forensic anthropologist?</h3>
Bones and other hard tissues are the focus of forensic anthropologists' research. They are knowledgeable with uncovering buried remains and methodically recording the facts due to their background in archaeology.
<h3>Who is anthropologist?</h3>
A person who practices anthropology is known as an anthropologist. Anthropology is the study of human characteristics in relation to both historical and contemporary society.
To know more about anthropologist visit: brainly.com/question/27268699
#SPJ4
Answer:
The statement which is the best argument against Social Darwinism is:
B. A good work ethic can eliminate a lot of the disadvantages of poverty.
Explanation:
Social Darwinism is a philosophy that incorporates notions taken from Darwinism, applying them to sciences such as sociology and economics. As we know, <u>Darwinism is based on the idea of "survival of the fittest". Therefore, Social Darwinism explains differences in status, wealth, and success by stating that those who have those things are better than those who do not. In other words, if someone is poor or unsuccessful, that means that person is not "evolved" enough.</u>
The problem with Social Darwinism is that is justifies discrimination and imperialism. It places the blame on those who are actually suffering the consequences of a broken and unfair system. With that in mind, we can easily eliminate options A and C, since they agree with Social Darwinism. Option D can also be eliminated because it merely states a fact that is true, but does not refute Social Darwinism.<u> Letter B is the best option. It argues that there is a way to eliminate many of the disadvantages, that is, it shows the problem with the system, refuting Social Darwinism.</u>
The correct answer is common.
Most people in the United States of America support suicide. Almost two-thirds of the country of all American citizens supports suicide as an escape route from pain and agony. Yet, suicide remains as a bad idea to combat pain, which is why it is still opposed by many individuals, especially the Catholic Church.
