In order to properly tackle this problem, we must understand the relationship between the nominal annual rate and real (effective) annual rate.
To do this:
-First you take the nominal rate, divide by the number of times it's compounded (converted) per year.
-Then, add one to that number, and raise that number to the power of how many times you compound per year.
Here is the method in practice:
First 3 Years:
Nominal rate= 2% ÷ 12 times/yr = 0.001667
Effective rate = 1.001667 ^12 = 1.020184
Next 2 Years (Discounting)
3% ÷ 2/yr = .015
1.015 ^ 2 = 1.061364
Next 4 years (Interest)
.042 ÷ .5 (once every 2 years) = .084
1.084 ^ (1/2) = 1.041153
The last 3 years are already expressed as an effective rate, so we don't need to convert them. The annual rate is:
1.058
I kept the 1 in the numbers (1.058 instead of 5.8% for example) so that it's easier to find the final number
Take every relevant number and raise it to the power of the number of years it's compounded for. For discounting, raise it to a negative power.
First 3 years: 1.020184 ^ 3 = 1.061784
Next 2 years: 1.030225 ^ -2 = .942184
Next 4 years: 1.041163 ^ 4 = 1.175056
Last 3 years: 1.058 ^ -3 = .84439
Multiply these numbers (include all decimals when you do this calculation)
1.062 * .942 * 1.175 * .844 = .992598
This is our final multiplier to find the effect on our principal:
.992598 * 2,480 = 2461.64
Answer is 2461.64
Answer:
b.There is no effect on the accounting equation as one asset account increases while another asset account decreases.
Explanation:
On billing the customer, sales account would have been credited and accounts receivables debited.
On payment by the customer, accounts receivables would be credited and cash account debited.
Hence there will be no increase/decrease in asset as cash and receivables would nil off.
As such, the right option is b.There is no effect on the accounting equation as one asset account increases while another asset account decreases.
Acc 450 when financial statements are affected by a material departure from generally accepted accounting principles, the auditors should Issue an "except for" qualification or an adverse opinion.
When auditors were unable to gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence on specific matters and their impact was material but not pervasive, a qualified opinion was also offered. Auditors typically provide a qualified opinion by stating that, with the exception of particular transactions or balances, or circumstances, the financial statements are free of major misstatements.
To describe the nature and circumstances that led auditors to modify their view in the audit report, a reason for adverse opinion paragraph must be added as a distinct paragraph to an adverse audit report.
The balance sheet and income statement, as well as each of their individual line items, would alter if the financial statements adhered to appropriate accounting rules, according to a basis for unfavourable opinion paragraph.
Learn more about Financial statements here brainly.com/question/16479401
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option A is correct one.
<u>Are more summarised than for lower levels of management</u>
Explanation:
For higher levels of management, responsibility accounting reports<u> are more summarised than for lower levels of management.</u>
It is a summarised report facilitating the higher levels of management in order to keep a track of performance of low level management.
Answer:
C) lack of venture capital for innovative products.
Explanation:
Embryonic industries are such industries that are at the beginning stage in their life-cycle. More specifically, newly established ventures are called the embryonic industry or firm.
Options A, B, D, and E all are wrong because a new firm may not produce high qualified first products. It may not have the right complementary products, the production cost may be higher than expected, and finally, there are a few distribution points. Those lead to the slow growth of the embryonic industry.
Option C is the answer because venture capitalists like to invest in innovative products, so there should not be a lack of capital.