Answer:
Consider the following calculations
Explanation:
A. Dividend per Share = Dividend Payout Ratio * Earnings Per Share
Putting the values given to calculate dividend per share we get,
Stages DPS = Payout Ratio * EPS DPS
Stage 1 =0.00*$0.30 $0
Stage 2 = 0.13*1.95 $0.25
Stage 3 =0.31 * $ 2.80 $0.868
Stage 4 = 0.56*$3.40 $1.90
b. Calculation of Investors After Tax Income from Cash Dividend:-
Cash Dividend = Number of Shares * DPS in Stage IV
= 290 * $ 1.90
= $552.16
After Tax Income = DIvidend ( 1 - Tax Rate)
= $ 552.16 ( 1- 0.15)
= $ 469.34
C:- In Stage II and Stage III for Growth & Expansion respectively, the firm is likely to utilise stock dividend or stock split.
I would say C is the answer bc that’s would i would do in that situation.
Base on the scenario, the email metric that you can ignore
after your boss asked you to do some reporting in your email performance last
quarter is the industry average. The industry average are used in means of
having to create components financially when it comes to business plan.
The environmental protection agency was formed in 1970, Exchange in the immediate environment is this an example of Governmental bodies and the firm.
<h3>What was the goal of the 1970 Environmental Protection Act quizlet?</h3>
- This act's objective is to "promote productive and joyful harmony between man and his environment." In 1970, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established. The cleanup of toxic waste left behind from decades of unrestricted dumping was its primary focus.
- The Environmental Protection Agency's principal responsibility is to regulate environmental law. It was founded in 1970. They put in place programs to reduce pollution and protect the environment. Describe the federal rules and regulations in place to protect the environment from air pollution.
To learn more about Environmental Protection Agency refer,
brainly.com/question/14956213
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": negligence per se.
Explanation:
Negligence per se is a U.S. doctrine that is applied when there has been a clear statute breach. It is applied mainly in cases where the defendant has caused harm to the plaintiff by violating a statue that should have been of knowledge to the defendant.
