Answer:
b. decreases retained earnings but does not change total stockholders' equity.
Explanation:
<u>a. </u>increases common stock outstanding and increases total stockholders' equity.
<u>FALSE: </u>The Equity does not change as the Retained Earnings are used to issue the Shares, so no change in the total Stockholders Equity
<u>d. </u>increases retained earnings and increase total stockholders' equity.
<u>FALSE: </u>The retained earnings are debited thus, decrease when declaring dividends
<u>c.</u> may increase or decrease paid-in capital above par but do not change total
stockholders' equity.
<u>FALSE: </u>paid in will increase or not be used, as the shares will have a minimum value for the company of his face value.
<u>b. TRUE</u> RE decrease as from there comes to the funds. The total SE does not change it change his composition.
<span>According to revised weight-loss prediction equations, a deficit of 10 kilocalories per day leads to an average weight loss of one pound over a 3-year period. Also if you noticed that during your losing of weight program you slowed down, it means that you have to increase your physical activity to compensate for it.</span>
Explanation:
Trade offs are something in which there are two things and we choose one of them according to our own preference or need. This is and should be our personal decision, but when Corporations and Governments decide on what to choose between two things, there would might be a negative impact on someone's life. He might feel controlled by the corporations and governments. For example, if corporations of CNG decides with the government that it is better for consumers to use CNG than Petrol in their cars, and lowers taxes on CNG and encourage consumers to shift towards CNG, then this trade off will have an impact of being controlled by the big giants. The choice should be of consumer's. The consumer should be the one who will trade off between things who are preferable for him.
It is and should be the managers job to do that
in this case, identical changes in autonomous consumption and autonomous government spending: <span> have different effects on equilibrium income
When a factor is implemented and have two different reaction, it is safe to assume that that factor have two different effects.
For example, an increasing interest in technology(autonomous consumption) may increased the investment for tech products. The government spending may not give as much influence in this context because it wont affect the transaction between the customers and the producer
</span>
