Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Fearing that the new national government would be too strong and so jeopardize individual liberty, the Anti-Federalists fought against the passage of the U.S. Constitution in 1787. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Constitution?</h3>
Generally, a set of generally accepted norms or guiding principles by which a country or other group is ruled.
In conclusion, In writing an essay you must consider the structure of the essay, Hence, the structure of the essay should be considered;
- The Introduction
- The body
- The conclusion
Read more about Constitution
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ1
When Steve and Kathy divorced, they agreed to share the responsibility for the care and raising of their children. In the context of child custody, this arrangement exemplifies joint custody.
What is joint custody?
Sharing of parental responsibilities for the child is included in joint custody. Joint custody involves both parents actively participating in the child's upbringing, as opposed to exclusive custody, when one parent has complete control. Physical and legal custody might be shared equally, as well as both.
What are the disadvantages of joint custody?
Youngsters can experience alienation and confusion because they are frequently in a condition of limbo and are continually moving between their parents' homes. Additionally, keeping up two homes for the child's needs is frequently very difficult for parents.
Learn more about Joint Custody: brainly.com/question/9117788
#SPJ4
They had strong ties with Britain.