1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marshall27 [118]
2 years ago
15

In a(n) ________, merchandise is allocated to stores on the basis of forecasted demand

Social Studies
1 answer:
Olenka [21]2 years ago
5 0

In a(n) <u>push supply chain</u>, merchandise is allocated to stores on the basis of forecasted demand.

The push supply chain approach means that selections about when merchandise is synthetic and shipped are decided by using expected client demand. The most apparent example of the traditional push deliver chain method is for seasonal items.

The supply chain approach determines that product must be fabricated, brought to distribution facilities, and made available in the retail channel. beneath a pull supply chain, actual client demand drives the manner, whilst push techniques are pushed by lengthy-time period projections of customer demand.

A Push-model delivery Chain is one wherein projected demand determines what enters the manner. For example, umbrellas get pushed to shops a month before the rainy season begins.

Learn more about push supply chain here: brainly.com/question/28104819

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
How do corruption and undemocratic government contribute to proverty in West and Central Africa?
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

Corruption has acquired the status of a continental emergency in Africa. But this is not another pontification on corruption. Rather, it is a polemical disavowal of a few popular stereotypes and fallacies on corruption in Africa. It is laced, for good measure, with a few contrarian perspectives on the phenomenon.

One of the most insightful attempts to explain the cultural basis of political corruption in Africa contends that patronage ties between regular Africans and the political elite place informal obligations and demands on the latter, obligations which are often fulfilled through corrupt enrichment. Corruption in this explanation has many participants besides the politician or bureaucrat who actually engages in the act. It is an explanation that understands corruption through the prism of mass complicity and cultural toleration.

This explanation captures some of the reality of corruption in Africa. The typical African politician does not only grapple with financial pressure from family but also from kin, clan, hometown, and ethnic constituents. Indeed, the network of people that makes corrupt acts possible and sometimes undetectable includes not just politicians and state bureaucrats but also family members, friends, ethically challenged financial and legal experts, and traditional institutions of restraint. In Africa, corruption is indeed a group act.

Because of the absence of state welfare institutions in much of Africa, political constituents expect politicians representing them to cater to their quotidian and small-scale infrastructural needs. It is generally understood and quietly tolerated that a politician has to rely on his informal access to public funds to satisfy these informal requests for patronage and largesse. Many Africans euphemistically call this “patronage politics.” They may tolerate and normalize it as African grassroots politics. To Western observers, it is corruption at its crudest.

One can argue that this is a product of the nexus of over-centralized power, access to resources, and ethnic competition (which are features of most African countries), but this hardly accounts for the multi-ethnic and socially diverse cast of actors in most corruption scandals in Africa. Or for the fact that in much of continent, corruption is often the reason why overly centrist, patrimonial, and illogical states endure and not vice versa. The tragedy of many African countries—Nigeria particularly stands out—is that corruption and patronage politics are the recurring baselines of political compromise and consensus among self-interested but bitterly divided political elites.

True as it may be, it is very easy to overtate the argument about how the nature of the states inherited from colonial times sustains corruption in Africa. Such an overstatement often elides more socially embedded, low-level, and less obvious platforms that support and legitimize corrupt acts—or at least make them seem normal. This pseudo-cultural normalization of corruption is one of the biggest obstacles in the way entrenching transparency in government bureaucracies in Africa.

Nothing encapsulates this reality more than the pervasive Nigerian fad of traditional chieftaincy institutions dolling out titles to citizens whose source of wealth is questionable at best. What does one make of African universities that routinely give out honorary degrees to patently corrupt donors? Or churches and mosques that project demonstrably corrupt members as models of piety, accomplishment, and Godly favour?

What these practices do is to invest and implicate many Africans indirectly in the phenomenon of corruption. They are subtle and invidious, but they work to co-opt many Africans, even without their self-conscious consent, into the cultural and religious contexts in which corrupt acts and corrupt persons find rehabilitation and validation.

The result is that many Africans, even while expressing outrage against corruption privately, are publicly indifferent to its manifestation, especially if they are situated in social networks that benefit from the patronage politics through which corruption thrives. As a result they may feel too culturally complicit to take a stand. This kind of complicity makes official policy against corruption difficult because it mitigates the public pressure necessary for official action against corruption.

But Africans also draw clear moral lines in their narrative on corruption. Their tolerance for patronage and its lubrication by state resources does not prevent them from condemning the abuse of this kind of politics by greedy politicians. Nor does it blind them to the political excess of treasury looting for purely personal enrichment.

3 0
3 years ago
True or False: During the Renaissance students stopped studying religious subjects and only learned about humanities.
jekas [21]

mainly true but they learned about both. so, do what you will. both could be correct?

6 0
2 years ago
La Mesa real estate broker Michael Hagans plans to begin listing or selling mobile homes. He must comply with all but one of the
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

a. He must only sell new mobile homes.  

Explanation:

Mobile homes are those homes which are built before the year 1976. these homes are built with less safety standards when compared to manufactured homes.

In the context, Michael Hagans is a real estate broker of La Mesa. While making a plan to sell mobile homes, according to the California Housing department, it is not mandatory to sell only new mobile homes.

Hence the correct option is (a).

7 0
3 years ago
What are the types of distractions
alekssr [168]
There’s three types. Visual, manual, and cognitive. Let’s take driving as our example. A visual distraction is taking your eyes off the road, a manual distraction is taking your hands off the wheel and cognitive is taking your mind off the road as you drive
3 0
3 years ago
according to the supremacy clause, which level of government is supreme? group of answer choices state local national providence
Ivan

The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) declares that the Constitution, federal legislation adopted in accordance with it, and treaties signed in accordance with its authority are the "supreme Law of the Land" and supersede any conflicting state laws.

It stipulates that state constitutions are subordinate to the supreme law and that state courts must abide by it.

Thus, Option A is correct.

<h3>Why did the Supremacy Clause come into being?</h3>

The provision gave the Supreme Court the power to support the creation of a robust federal government. The U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause was added because the Articles of Confederation did not have one. According to the Articles, state laws could not and did not take precedence over federal legislation.

For more information about Supremacy Clause refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/13839329

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Accounting for almost 60% of American exports by the beginning of the Civil War, which statement regarding the impact of cotton
    15·2 answers
  • ethical values are those beliefs and principles that seek to promote human weel-being in an impartial way. human well-beings is
    13·1 answer
  • Ancient Egyptian communities were able to grow and become successful due in large part of . the Nile River. the Tigris River. .
    5·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the six geographic regions of Arkansas
    11·2 answers
  • What important resource do Qantas move?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement is true of the southern colonies in the late 1600s?
    14·1 answer
  • Which best describes the impact of the War of 1812 on western settlement in the US?
    10·1 answer
  • What were some of the accomplishments of Captain Jones?
    15·2 answers
  • What do you think is the MOST important Byzantine achievement? Why?
    8·2 answers
  • Describes how water scarcity impacts life in Africa.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!