That statement is false.
A drink would be considered as a high-proof drink if it contains high amount of ethanol inside it.
On average, a higher-proof drink could produce as many as twice the amount of alcohol effect compared to average alcohol drink.
On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.
During a two-hour interrogation, Miranda confessed to the crimes. Lawyers would contend that Miranda had not been clearly informed of his rights to have a lawyer and against self-incrimination. Their appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court would forever change U.S. criminal procedure
<span> Congress had the constitutional right to regulate commerce between the states</span>