1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Strike441 [17]
2 years ago
5

Erikson believed that each of the eight stages of psychosocial development must be addressed in order to move on to the next sta

ge.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Naya [18.7K]2 years ago
7 0

Erikson believed that each of the eight stages of psychosocial development must be addressed in order to move on to the next stage. The statement is True.

<h3><u>What is psychosocial development?</u></h3>
  • The term "psychosocial development" refers to how a person's personality changes during childhood and adulthood, as well as how social skills are acquired.
  • Erik Erikson, a psychologist, developed his eight-stage model of psychological development in the 1950s.
  • Each stage, according to Erikson, is marked by a "psychosocial crisis" that can either have a beneficial or detrimental impact on a person's psyche.
  • Erikson asserts that a person's personality and social abilities change over the course of eight stages that span the entirety of their life.

A person encounters a psychosocial crisis—critical issues—at each level, which must be overcome. The way a person handles each of these crises has an impact on their personality. If people respond favorably, they acquire a new virtue (moral behavior).

Know more about psychosocial development with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/28078832

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
What is the purpose of government? Select a quotation from a US leader. Then, write an argumentative essay that explains why you
shutvik [7]

Answer:

we hold the truth to be self evident that all men are created equal-thomas Jefferson

Explanation:

I agree with Thomas Jefferson because I feel as if the government is there to not only protect us but to also remind us that we all have the same amount of power. we can use that power for whatever we want and the government is also important because they take all our opinions and make one big solution so we are all happy

(I don't know if that's good enough)

5 0
2 years ago
If bob excels in all aspects of camping (faster at carrying a backpack, gathering firewood, paddling a canoe, setting up tents,
forsale [732]

Answer:

Absolute advantage

Explanation:

Absolute advantage refers to a situation when an individuals or organizations able to produce more with significantly lower efforts compared to other competitors around them.

From the excerpt above, we can infer that  Bob could do various useful things related to camping compared to his other inexperienced friends. So when they're being put together, there is no doubt that Bob would be far more useful on the camp compared to other, and he will be put in higher regards in that community.

5 0
4 years ago
In a paragraph of 4-7 sentences, explain the Great Compromise as if you were one of the patriots there in that time.
lions [1.4K]

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

6 0
3 years ago
Help me out!! :) each word has to go in each sentence
eimsori [14]

Answer:

Congress shall make no LAW respecting an establishment of RELIGION, or prohibiting the free EXERCISE thereof; or abridging the freedom of SPEECH, or of the PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to ASSEMBLE, and to PETITION the Government for a redress of GRIEVANCES.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Marina believes that high doses of caffeine slow a person's reaction time. To test this belief, she has five friends each drink
Nana76 [90]

Answer:Explained

Explanation:

Martina's strategy is wrong because there is no controlled conditions.

Any hypothesis which addresses the problem is done under controlled conditions in which only one or two factors are changed while others remains constant.

In Martina's strategy there is no restriction on five participants and they are allowed to do learn by their own technique.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Research study 3.3: anton and his friends are discussing a study he read about in his developmental psychology class. in the stu
    14·2 answers
  • The theme system is best described as
    12·1 answer
  • Egypt was the first country in the Middle East to
    8·2 answers
  • Kelly broke a lamp and was told that she had been bad. later that evening, she was told that her parents were getting a divorce.
    14·2 answers
  • Is steak abiotic or biotic
    11·1 answer
  • Moora and Trun, two countries that are part of the BURPHA common market have an exchange rate system where the values of their c
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a major cause of the independence movements listed above? A. The first public steamboat sailed in 180
    14·2 answers
  • Evaluate Which two threats to marine<br> ecosystems do you think are the most serious?<br> Why?
    5·1 answer
  • What was Napoleon’s final military campaign?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the problem in Look both ways by jason reynolds
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!