Answer:
The first amendment permits all citizens of the United States of America to protest or criticize the government or government policy or action when they don't include actual threats, obscenity, incite to lawless actions, advertise or perform integral illegal conduct while they perform their protest. In all cases when this is not included. The first amendment protects the protestor.
Explanation:
All right, first of all, the first amendment says all citizens are free to manifest their thoughts about any government action but only when they don't make threats, talk obscenity, incite to lawless actions, or advertise. Also, that they can make a protest and they won't arrest them if they don't break the freedom of someone else. For example, stopping the traffic, attacking vehicles, vandalizing them is an act to be arrested because those are illegal acts. That is why many people use the term peaceful protest. Because in those protests, there is no riot or damage involved. And that type of protest is a legal protest.
Answer:
a bench trial
Explanation:
because it is a trial by as opposed to a trial by jury
Answer:
Answer to the following question is as follows;
Explanation:
Government legislation is in place to assist the impacted communities. Non-governmental organizations exert pressure on the government to give required assistance, such as material. Religious groups have a role in affecting communities by inspiring other institutions, individuals, and the government to do the same.
Answer:
No I dont think so
Explanation:
Speaking from the view of those things (tsunami volcanic eruption) I do not think there Can be any reduction because the volcanic eruption is actually from under the earth's crust and there's no possible way to stop it if I'm not mistaken the only thing I'm sure about is that climate Change is taking place and this things tend to happen if not taken strictly seriously
From my point of view though
