That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>learning </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>Learning perspective</em><em> is described as one of the psychological approaches that generally signifies about the way experience and environment affects an individual's or animal's different actions and it encompasses social-cognitive and behaviorism learning theories.</em>
<em>The learning theory </em><em>was initially started with the work of a psychologist named </em><em>Albert Bandura</em><em> who has proposed the social learning theory.</em>
<em>As per the question, the therapist's suggestion most clearly reflects a learning perspective.</em>
<em> </em>
Hi im bob im going to help you
Write a list of ideas. Decide which idea you know themost about. Which idea would have the most impact, orbe the most interesting?
