Answer:
b.
The store is not liable to Nelson.
Explanation:
These are options for the question
.
The store is strictly liable to Nelson.
b.
The store is not liable to Nelson.
c.
Res ipsa loquitur would require the store to be held liable.
d.
The store has no duty to Nelson.
From the question, we are informed about the local supermarket which has a large, glass front door which is well lighted and plainly visible. Nelson, who is new in the neighborhood, mistook the glass for an open doorway and walked into it, shattering the door and injuring himself.
Under the Second Restatement, the store is not liable to Nelson. Second Restatement are legal treatises that pronounce some rules as far as law is concerned.it inform judges about general principle, therefore, under this second Restatement the store is not liable to Nelson in anyway even though he sustained some injury from the store.
Answer:
im not sure how to help maybe divide and multiply
Explanation:
I will have to go with C but I’m not completely sure
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Cost of goods sold A/c Dr $1,200
To Merchandise inventory A/c $1,200
(Being the shrinkage inventory is recorded)
The computation is shown below:
= $44,000 - $42,800
= $1,200
We simply debited the costs of goods sold and credited the merchandise inventory so that the correct posting can be done
Answer:
<u>Foreign exchange risk management strategy</u>
Explanation:
In simple terms, what the Foreign exchange risk management strategy entails is the measures used by companies to protect or to create a safety net against any potential losses that may arise due to fluctuation in the exchange rates.
By approaching its bank in January [about three months in advance] in other to agree on an exchange rate at which they will make a payment, FBL Inc was implementing its Foreign exchange risk management strategy.