Answer:
1.The money demand will rise by 1.154%
2. The money demanded will fall and for a 1% increase in interest , the money demanded will fall by 0.38%
Explanation:
1. Money demand function
ln(m) = β0 +β1 ln(GDP)+β2R
Suppose β1 = 1.5 , β2 = −0.04 , GDP = $ 100 & R = 3%
ln(m) = 1.5 ln ($100) - 0.04 X 0.03
ln(m) = 6.91
m = 1002.247
Suppose the GDP increases by 1%; the new GDP will be = $ 101
ln(m) = 1.5 ln ($101) - 0.04 X 0.03
ln(m) = 6.92
m = 1013.81
If the GDP increases by 1% ,the money demand will rise by 1.154%
2.
If the interest rate increases from 3% to 4%
ln(m) = 1.5 ln ($100) - 0.04 X 0.04
ln(m) = 6.906155
m = $ 998.400
If the interest rate rises from 3% to 4% , the money demanded will fall and for a 1% increase in interest , the money demanded will fall by 0.38%
Answer:
A. Increase investment in long-term bonds
Explanation:
According to the Expectations hypothesis which is based on the principle that long-term rate is determined purely by current and future expected short-term rates, such that he expected final value from the accumulation of progression of short-term bonds approximates the final value from investing in long-term bonds.
Hence, given that when the interest rates fall, the prices of the bonds on the market already will rise, then it can be concluded that If the fund manager thinks that interest rates are going to fall, she should Increase investment in long-term bonds
Answer:
$4,850
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Total cost when the production is 13,000 units
Direct materials $10,920
Direct labor $14,690
Variable overhead $16,380
Total $41,900
And, the other case
Their new cost on supplier offer is
= $2.85 × 13,000 units
= $37,050
In the case when the order is accepted So the net income would increased by
= $41,900 - $37,050
= $4,850
When milk has an absolute advantage in the production of two goods over Tommy, Milk IS MORE PRODUCTIVE IN PRODUCING BOTH GOODS THAN TOMMY.
A country or an individual is said to have absolute advantage in producing a good if the person can produce the good more efficiently economic wise.
