1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tom [10]
2 years ago
9

How can we promote social and economic development in local government?

Social Studies
1 answer:
ololo11 [35]2 years ago
4 0

Keep your community members informed and include them whenever possible in the decision-making and marketing of the community. Promoting the growth of all economic sectors in the region.

<h3>How can we achieve social-economic development?</h3>

Long-term and reflective planning, HRD, social welfare, honesty, National character, optimum utilization of national resources, technology, and strong moral values are essential to achieve sustainable socio-economic development.

The local government can play an important role in promoting job creation and boosting the local economy. Providing good quality cost-effective services and making the local area a pleasant place to live and work in the municipality will have made a good start to sustainable local economic development.

To learn more about social-economic development visit the link

brainly.com/question/14848167

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Nomadic societies negatively impact the environment more than industrial societies. Please select the best answer from the choic
guajiro [1.7K]

This question is incomplete because the options are missing; here is the complete question:

Nomadic societies negatively impact the environment more than industrial societies.

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

True

False

The answer to this question is False

Explanation:

First human societies were nomadic, this means to obtain sources such as food, shelter, or water, groups moved from one area to another. This lifestyle had fewer negative effects on the environment in comparison to modern industrial societies. This is because industrial societies rely on exploiting natural resources and manufacturing processes to create new products. These two factors lead to the depletion of natural resources and the increase of pollution as chemicals are released as part of production, which does not occur in nomadism. In this context, industrial societies negatively impact the environment more than nomadic societies, therefore the statement is false.

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP A major development in relations between the Soviet Union and the United States occurred in the late 1980’s when the
White raven [17]

Answer:

About the author

Rebecca Johnson

Rebecca Johnson is Executive Director of the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy.

Established upon the ashes of the Second World War to represent “We the Peoples”, it is not surprising that both peace and security were fundamental objectives for the United Nations. While many also wanted disarmament, countervailing lessons were drawn by some political leaders, which made it difficult to get multilateral agreements on disarmament for several decades. Debates around nuclear weapons epitomized and sharpened the challenges. Academics in the United States of America led in developing theories of deterrence to provide legitimacy for these weapons of mass destruction, which soon became embedded in the military doctrines and political rhetoric of further Governments, from NATO allies to the Eastern bloc and beyond. Deterrence theory sought to invert the normative relationship between peace and disarmament by arguing that nuclear weapons were actually peacekeepers amassed to deter aggressors rather than to fight them. From there it became a short step for some countries—including permanent Members of the Security Council of the United Nations—to promote ideologies that equated security and peace with high “defence” budgets and military-industrial dependence on arms manufacture and trade. This is the backdrop for understanding how the United Nations System and disarmament approaches have intersected since 1945, and the way in which reframing disarmament as a universal humanitarian imperative has opened more productive opportunities for future multilateral disarmament treaties.

The very first resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations, in January 1946, addressed the “problems raised by the discovery of atomic energy”. Despite civil society’s efforts, led by scientists and women’s peace organizations, leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union rejected measures to curb nuclear ambitions. As the cold war took hold, the leaders that had emerged “victorious” in 1945 raced each other to manufacture and deploy all kinds of new weapons and war technologies, especially nuclear, chemical and biological weapons (notwithstanding the 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibiting the use of chemical and biological weapons in war) and a variety of missiles to deliver them speedily anywhere in the world.

After early efforts to control nuclear developments floundered, it was the upsurge of health and environmental concerns provoked by nuclear testing that led the Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Japanese Parliament to call for such explosions to be halted altogether. After an egregiously irresponsible 15 megaton thermonuclear bomb was tested in the Marshall Islands on 1 March 1954, Nehru submitted his proposal for a Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) to the United Nations Disarmament Commission on 29 July 1954. Since then CTBT has been the centrepiece of disarmament demands from many States, especially the developing countries of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Intended as a first step towards disarmament, the driving force behind CTBT was concern about the humanitarian impacts. Early attempts at multilateral negotiations through a newly created Ten-Nation Committee on Disarmament made little progress. Although the leaders of the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom professed their desire for a CTBT, their talks kept stalling. Obstacles from the nuclear laboratories and security advisors were dressed up as verification problems, but they stemmed from these nuclear-armed Governments’ military ambitions and rivalries, and their shared determination to keep their own weapons options open, even as they sought to limit those of others.

From 1959 to 1961, various resolutions were adopted by the General Assembly aimed at preventing the testing, acquisition, use, deployment and proliferation of nuclear weapons. In 1961, for example, General Assembly resolution 1664 (XVI) recognized that “the countries not possessing nuclear weapons have a grave interest, and an important part to fulfil” in halting nuclear tests and achieving nuclear disarmament. General Assembly resolution 1653 (XVI) went further, noting that the targets of nuclear weapons would not just be “enemies” but “peoples of the world not involved in…war”, with devastation that would “exceed even the scope of war and cause indiscriminate suffering and destruction to mankind…contrary to the rules of international law and to the laws of humanity”. And finally, General Assembly resolution 1665 (XVI), unanimously adopted, called on nuclear and non-nuclear weapons possessors to “cooperate” to prevent further acquisition and spread of nuclear weapons. These early resolutions fed into “non-proliferation” talks between the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom, viewed as first steps towards disarmament.

4 0
3 years ago
Here is a free one so ya ...
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

{\boxed{\boxed{\tt { Tysm !!}}}} \

8 0
2 years ago
From an early age, Kwaku got into trouble constantly. He continually violates the rights of others and he often lies, fights, an
Alenkinab [10]

the answer to this is b

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
__________ provide ideals of beliefs about behavior but do not state explicitly how we should behave; __________ are established
sergeinik [125]

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question will be "Values and Norms".

Explanation:

  • General values are ideals that determine what is right and what is wrong. Norms are laws and obligation which define how people in different social circumstances should and shouldn't act.
  • Norms are set guidelines of conduct and behavior guidelines, while values include principles or expectations about actions, but don't specifically state how to conduct ourselves.

Therefore, this will be the right answer.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Gross Domestic Product (GDP) includes _____. exports, but not imports
    6·2 answers
  • Which theory states "People who have little to lose are more likely to be deviant"? A. Social promotion theory B. Self-reliance
    13·2 answers
  • which branch of the law regulates wrongful acts involving injury to one���s person, property, or reputation in a situation not c
    5·1 answer
  • The jury was not sequestered and had access to the media coverage. Elaine was found guilty. After her conviction, Elaine claimed
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these is NOT a right/freedom in the Bill of Rights? *
    12·2 answers
  • The Civil War changed young people's lives. Many teenagers joined the army. About half of school-age children did not go to scho
    5·1 answer
  • Picture below<br> thanks and God bless
    8·2 answers
  • How to be all time motivated in studies ​
    10·1 answer
  • What was the situation before the development of the creation of a 100% artificial cell?​
    8·1 answer
  • Who do you want to be like when you grow up your mother or your father
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!