Answer:
To understand how we can better attain our goals, let's begin with defining what a goal is and what underlies it, psychologically. A goal is the cognitive representation of a desired state, or, in other words, our mental idea of how we'd like things to turn out (Fishbach & Ferguson 2007; Kruglanski, 1996).
Explanation:
<h2><em>hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>helpful</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em> </em></h2><h2><em>keep</em><em> </em><em>smiling</em><em> </em></h2>
<em>Farming meant that people did not need to travel to find food. Instead, they began to live in settled communities, and grew crops or raised animals on nearby land. They built stronger, more permanent homes and surrounded their settlements with walls to protect themselves.</em>
<em />
<h2><em>You're welcome ✨</em></h2><h2><em>Have a nice night </em></h2><h2><em /></h2>
<span>The question concerns Zora Neale Hurston's 1937 novel "Their Eyes Were Watching God". Janie is the lead character, who is searching for happiness. In the novel, she meets Vergible Woods, who goes by name "Tea Cake". Janie is doubtful first. She is concerned that he is too young for her and he is going to take advantage of her wealth. Tea Cake plays his "imaginary" guitar and makes her smile.</span>
Answer: The KKK's hatred was directed not only against black people, but also against European Catholic and Jewish immigrants flocking to the U.S. after the war. In 1925 and 1926, the Klan descended on Washington, D.C. for two massive marches. City officials fiercely debated whether to allow a white supremacist organization known for lynchings, violence and terror to parade around the U.S. capital. The decision was ultimately made to let them march, albeit without their signature masks. The so-called “konklave” drew upwards of 50,000 Klansmen, who marched through the city in a chilling display.
fOLLOW ME ON INSTAGRAM _IAMNYRI_
HOPEFULLY YOU MAKE A GOOD GRADE
Answer:
His personality, the situation
Explanation:
<em>According to the ultimate attribution error, if an observer thought a harm-doer was black, they would be more likely to attribute his action to his personality. If an observer thought he was white, they would be more willing to attribute his action to the situation.</em>
Because, of the double standard created by the prejudice.
