1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zvonat [6]
3 years ago
8

What did the 1926 march of Klansmen in Washington, D.C. demonstrate?

Social Studies
1 answer:
makvit [3.9K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The KKK's hatred was directed not only against black people, but also against European Catholic and Jewish immigrants flocking to the U.S. after the war.  In 1925 and 1926, the Klan descended on Washington, D.C. for two massive marches.  City officials fiercely debated whether to allow a white supremacist organization known for lynchings, violence and terror to parade around the U.S. capital. The decision was ultimately made to let them march, albeit without their signature masks.  The so-called “konklave” drew upwards of 50,000 Klansmen, who marched through the city in a chilling display.

fOLLOW ME ON INSTAGRAM _IAMNYRI_

HOPEFULLY YOU MAKE A GOOD GRADE

You might be interested in
During the Constitutional Convention which plan of government proposed A legislature made up of one house each state getting equ
nexus9112 [7]
The New Jersey plan proposed this.

They proposed this, because they wanted smaller states to have equal powers in the government with the larger states. The other plan proposed was the Virginia plan. They wanted the states to have votes proportional to the population. However, the small states didn't like this because they would have less power in the government.

Eventually, they decided on a compromise, with the Senate following the New Jersey plan of each state getting equal representation, and the House of Representatives following the Virginia plan of votes proportional to the population.
5 0
3 years ago
What are the problems with a strong Central government and a small limited government? What is the solution
xeze [42]
Hiya,

A strong Central government is bad because if the government releases a law that just so happens to be bad, it will apply to everyone and this could be horrible for the whole country. If state decisions are bad, it won't hurt the whole nation but only that said state. People fear a strong Central government might even overpower small state governments and lose independence.

Now the trouble with a limited government is that it takes time to make decisions and fraud can easily happen. With a limited government there is also limited happiness.

A solution to this would be to just have a little bit of both. Limited government can increase fairness and give more freedom and power to their people and kick out the terrible leaders whereas a strong central government you can also have the security and freedom.

Hope this helps, government was never fun tbh.
4 0
3 years ago
Why did the Hawaiian parliament shifted in favor of U.S. annexation?
loris [4]

<span><span>In the early weeks of the administration of President Benjamin Harrison (1889-1893), the U.S. minister to Hawaii, Henry Carter, drafted a free-trade treaty with Hawaii.  The treaty intended to transform the island nation into an American protectorate:  the United States would guarantee Hawaii’s independence at the price of American veto power over treaties Hawaii negotiated with other countries and American military authority over internal or external threats.  When a rebellion broke out in July 1889, Harrison ordered 70 marines to land and restore order in Hawaii, and thereafter stationed an American naval vessel off the Hawaiian coast.  The next year, the McKinley Tariff removed the trade advantage of Hawaii sugar producers, who relied overwhelmingly on American markets, by putting sugar on the duty-free list and granting a bounty to American sugar growers. The Hawaiian economy dropped into a depression, and as a result, white sugar growers favored establishment of an American protectorate or outright annexation.  Their plans were thwarted when Queen Liliuokalani, supported by Hawaiian nationalists, ascended the throne in January 1891.</span><span>The February 1892 elections in Hawaii resulted in a virtual deadlock between three parties.  Soon afterward, the new U.S. minister, John L. Stevens, requested instructions on how to react should rebels, who had consulted with him, overthrow the monarchy to establish a republic.  In May, Lorrin Thurston, a Hawaiian legislator and member of the secret Annexation Club, arrived in Washington, D.C., to lobby the Harrison administration to support a republican revolution.  He met with Secretary of State James Blaine and Navy Secretary Benjamin Tracy, but was not allowed to see the president.  In his final annual message to Congress in December 1892, Harrison endorsed development of the Pearl Harbor naval base and the laying of a telegraph cable to Hawaii.</span><span>The Hawaiian cabinet resigned on January 12, 1893.  Two days later, the queen announced a new constitution reasserting monarchical powers, and the Annexation Club moved to create a provisional government.  On January 16, Stevens ordered the 165-man U.S.S. Boston to land, ostensibly to protect the American mission.  The next day the rebels proclaimed a republic headed by Judge Stanford Dole, a wealthy planter.  The strategic placement of the American troops proved instrumental in preventing the royal forces from effectively responding to the coup.  On his own authority, Stevens recognized the new Hawaiian government, proclaimed it an American protectorate, and ordered the American flag flown on all government buildings. </span><span>Less than a month later, the new Hawaiian government had drafted and passed an annexation treaty, which it sent to the outgoing Harrison administration. After receiving assurances from U.S. ministers in France, Great Britain, and Russia that those nations would not protest, the Harrison administration signed the annexation treaty on February 14 and forwarded it to the Senate.  Harrison warned that annexation would prevent Hawaii from falling under the control of another great power, which would threaten American interests and security.  However, there was not enough support in the outgoing Republican-controlled Senate for the two-thirds vote required for ratification, and the incoming Democratic Senate would certainly defeat it. </span><span>On March 9, the new president, Democrat Grover Cleveland, withdrew the treaty and appointed a committee to investigate American involvement in the bloodless Hawaiian coup.  The report, released on July 25, harshly criticized Stevens’s role in the rebellion, argued that most native Hawaiians did not favor annexation, and suggested that the annexationists were acting out of economic self-interest.  The Cleveland administration requested that Dole and the provisional government abdicate, and that the queen grant them amnesty and recognize their acts while in office.  Both sides resisted, and in his December 1893 message to Congress, Cleveland handed the dilemma to them.  After extensive hearings, and the rejection of various proposals, Congress decided to leave the situation as it existed with the minority government in power and Hawaii independent.</span><span>In March 1897, William McKinley, the new Republican president, met with his advisors to discuss whether it was preferable to annex Hawaii by treaty or congressional resolution.  In April, the Hawaiian minister to the U.S. officially requested that the McKinley administration begin negotiations on an annexation treaty.  Around the same time, the Republican-controlled Senate was preparing to prohibit Hawaiian sugar from the American market.  On June 16, President McKinley sent an annexation treaty to the Senate, stating that the annexation of Hawaii by the United States was only a matter of time.  Although most Republicans supported the treaty, Southern Democrats looked upon it with disfavor for reasons of economics (sugar interests</span><span>Robert C. Kennedy</span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
What was the relationship between England and Spain in the ate 1500's?
bezimeni [28]
England and Spain were at war in the late 1500's. It was called the "Anglo-Spanish war"
4 0
3 years ago
North African countries, such as Libya and Egypt, are known for their production of __________. A. oil B. diamonds C. gold D. ur
Reil [10]

Answer:

Oil :)) Just took answered the question!!

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 4. List and explain the other two ranks of the Order of Canada.
    8·1 answer
  • Most Myths have there basis in _______
    15·2 answers
  • Goffman's term for refraining from directly interacting with someone you know until an opening bracket has been issued is known
    9·1 answer
  • Anno Domini is Latin for “____________.”
    7·1 answer
  • What's the root word for enslave
    14·1 answer
  • To become a more value-driven organization, Pokrah University is holding regular coffee-hour discussions with its students and s
    13·2 answers
  • Four-year-old Nissa wants to throw her ball in the dining room. Her mother tells her not to throw the ball indoors because the b
    6·1 answer
  • 1. One turning point of the Civil War was the Battle of ____________________________. This battle forced the Confederates to ret
    15·1 answer
  • What is an amendment in reference to the united states constitution
    13·1 answer
  • According to max weber, all modern institutions are organized group of answer choices
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!