1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
m_a_m_a [10]
2 years ago
8

What did the emancipation proclamation claim to do? free all slaves free all slaves outlaw slavery outlaw slavery free slaves in

border states free slaves in border states free slaves in confederate states
History
1 answer:
Komok [63]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Free slaves in confederate states.

Explanation:

The Emancipation Proclamation is the proclamation issued by President Lincoln on January 1, 1863, freeing the slaves in those territories still in rebellion against the Union.  

The Presidential Executive Order known as the Liberation Proclamation is renowned for being the first widespread emancipation of Slaves in the Country, despite the fact that its overall effects were not fully realized. However, it did not immediately start to work.

Slavery was lawful in the South prior to the war, hence it was not possible to emancipate slaves there by executive order. However, when they opened fire on the U.S. Army while seeking to secede from the Union, the majority of the South willingly surrendered their Statehood and, thus, the authority of their State laws. Lincoln perceived an open window of opportunity to address slavery and went on to do so.

Although there was no longer a State Government in place, the territory that the Southern States had been inhabiting remained under the regular legal purview of the Federal Government.

Which meant that the land's legal standing changed to that of an American Territory, where only Federal Law was applicable.

Which implied that, by default, a President's Executive Order was paramount.

However, the EO's reason was to hinder the Confederate war effort, which depended largely on slave labor to deliver war supplies, build trenches, and other tasks that would be difficult if the slaves quit what they were working on and fled. On the other hand, unless the U.S. Army had gained control of disputed areas, giving the slaves freedom of action, the slaves couldn't really make a dash for it. Lincoln limited the legal applicability of the EP to Southern territory that the Army had retaken. Battle after battle

Naturally, the South eventually capitulated, and the Army took over rule over the whole region. Which meant that ALL of the millions of slaves in the Confederate South had been emancipated by the EP.

But a significant loose end existed. Four of the slave states in the South that bordered the North refused to engage in the official treason of "levying war against the USA" and continued to support the nation. These States' lawful State Law continued to permit slavery throughout the war, and as they never staged a revolt, the U.S. Army had no motive to seize control of those States.

The 13th Amendment, however, was quickly proposed and enacted to liberate the slaves in those four States and to replace the EP's power in the other Southern States with one that was far greater. Since the State Governments in the South would have obstructed the Amendment, this was done as soon as possible.

Lincoln seized a little window of opportunity that presented itself.

<h3>What were the reasons for the Emancipation Proclamation?</h3>

Contrary to common opinion, the North's endeavor to free Southern slaves did not trigger the outbreak of the Civil War. It was over the South's assertion that every state had the right to complete autonomy over its system of government. Even then, in the third year of the war, the Emancipation Proclamation was not even first presented. The Emancipation Proclamation provided the Union forces and the North a morale boost because it made the Civil War more than just a political conflict; it turned it into a conflict motivated by moral principles. The Civil War was, to put it mildly, tremendously unpopular.

Thank you,

Eddie

You might be interested in
What did people fear would happen if the nation went off the gold standard?
Olegator [25]
People would want to be turned into gold
8 0
4 years ago
¿Por qué los pensadores cristianos utilizaron la filosofía griega y romana para difundir su pensamiento?
Dominik [7]

Para hacer inteligibles los conceptos hebreos en términos de las filosofías griega y latina, manifestaciones de las culturas mayoritarias del Imperio Romano.

Puesto que los pensadores, teólogos, filósofos y exégetas Cristianos de los primeros, nacieron, crecieron y murieron en un territorio en donde las culturas latina y griega eran dominante como lo era dentro del Imperio Romano, cuyas ideas se difundían de extremo a extremo a través del Mar Mediterráneo (Mare Nostrum).

Además, la mayoría de la población del imperio era de cultura latina en su parte occidental (Africa, Italia, España, Francia) y de cultura griega en su parte oriental (Anatolia, Egipto, Grecia, los Balcanes), lo cual obligaba a emplear elementos de la filosofía griega y romana para hacer inteligibles al explicar conceptos hebreos en términos de esas dos culturas dominantes.

Un ejemplo de esto se puede apreciar en el uso de dos palabras griegas en el Nuevo Testamento que significaban <em>amor</em> (agape-filios).

He aquí una pregunta relacionada con la expansión del Cristianismo: brainly.com/question/23427428

8 0
3 years ago
Look at the following chart. Producer A’s opportunity cost would be analyzing the climate to see which fruit would grow better.
OleMash [197]

The correct answer is: "studying the profitability of growing apples versus oranges"

The opportunity cost is defined as the value of the rejected alternative when a producer, business, or investor chooses one option over another. The chosen alternative would be the one which carries the lowest opportunity cost.

In the example provided, if the producer discovers that the profitability of growing apples is larger, he would choose to produce apples. Then, the opportunity cost would be the amount of money that he could have gained from producing oranges.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did machine politics become common in big cities in the late 19th century?
astra-53 [7]
<span>The influx of a large number of foreign labor in need of jobs, representation, assistance and recognition. These immigrants could be pooled to provide leverage at the voting booth for the promised patronage of the political machines like Tammany Hall</span>
8 0
3 years ago
help me plz. How would New England culture have been different if they did not have access to waterways?
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

They would have to work harder to have drinkable water and it would take a toll on their trade

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The debate between William McKinley and William Jennings Bryan in the election of 1896 centered around
    7·2 answers
  • The dawes act was an attempt by the government to _____.
    7·1 answer
  • During the early 1800s, Native American tribes experienced which of the following?
    11·2 answers
  • Who is Cato the elder?
    13·2 answers
  • What three bodies of water border north korea?
    11·2 answers
  • What does it mean to be proactive​
    5·2 answers
  • what was one of the accomplishments of the Ming Dynasty? A.The abolishment of taxes. B.A public education. C. The one-child poli
    7·1 answer
  • How did Indian recognization act affect the Native Americans in Washington
    5·1 answer
  • Why does Leonard Pitts believe
    10·1 answer
  • Someone please help me:
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!