Answer:
Explanation:
The Federalist Era lasted roughly from 1789 to 1801, when the Federalist Party dominated and shaped American politics. This era saw the adoption of the U.S. Constitution and the growth of a strong centralized government.
The Missouri Compromise occurred in 1820. It set the idea that all states North of the 36. 30 parallel would be free and all below would be slave states (minus Missouri). It was an attempt to contain the spread of slavery.
Answer:
A
Explanation: Its the only one that looks correct.
Answer:Cherokee removal, part of the Trail of Tears, refers to the forced relocation between 1836 and 1839 of an estimated 16,000 members of the Cherokee Nation and 1,000-2,000 of their slaves; from their lands in Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Alabama to the Indian Territory (present day Oklahoma) in the then Western United States, and the resultant deaths along the way and at the end of the movement of an estimated 4,000 Cherokee and unknown number of slaves.
The Cherokee have come to call the event Nu na da ul tsun yi (the place where they cried); another term is Tlo va sa (our removal)—both phrases not used at the time, and seems to be of Choctaw origin. Removal actions (voluntary, reluctantly or forcibly) occurred to other American Indian groups in the American South, North, Midwest, Southwest, and the Plains regions. The Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, Cherokee and (Muskogee) were removed reluctantly. The Seminole in Florida resisted removal by the United States Army for decades (1817–1850) with guerrilla warfare, part of the intermittent Native American Wars that lasted from 1540 to 1924. Some Seminole remained in their Florida home country, while others were transported to Native American Territory in shackles.
The phrase "Trail of Tears" is used to refer to similar events endured by other Indian groups, especially among the "Five Civilized Tribes". The phrase originated as a description of the involuntary removal of the Choctaw Nation in 1831.[1]
Explanation:
Answer:
Tips to manage children among couples' conflicts.
Explanation:
Chronic Conflict among couples can be an issue of concern for their children. They might feel unvalued among the chaos, too agitated, or too submissive, too negative about relationships in general.
However, parents (Paul & her wife here) can play a huge role in ensuring that their relationship dynamics don't negatively effect their children -
- They should avoid quarelling in front of children, solve issues privately. They should not involve children in fights, not hope them to take either parent's side. They should make children understand that healthy debates & discussions are part & parcel of all relationships. They should ensure children that - irrespective of couple issues, they are always together with their children as a parent duo unified team.