The answer is a because 90% of the the lie detector tests are unable to always detect if someone is lying or not also it is fairly easy to get truths on a test if u can control ur breathing
<u>Answer:
</u>
The Aztec and the Incas were United in their opposition to the Spanish is a FALSE statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Before the arrival of Spanish conquistadors, the Aztecs and Incas fought amongst themselves for territorial dominance.
- After the Spanish arrived, a faction of Aztecs associated themselves with the Spanish in order to overthrow their incumbent emperor Moctezuma.
- The Aztecs were impressed by the modern weapons that the Spanish used and devised that it was difficult to survive in front of them.
- Never in history did the Aztecs and the Incas unite.
The reason why the car controlled by computerized
navigational guidance system is rapid in responding to obstructions rather than
humans who controls the car because it has a form of reaction of the neuron
where in the response are all or none, making it rapid in responding to
situations.
Most people in Latin America speak Spanish
The correct answer is "It does not pay for the players to collude with each other."
Which one of the following is not illustrated by the so-called Prisoner's Dilemma?
Answer: It does not pay for the players to collude with each other.
One of the best ways for scientists to do research is through games and simulations. The Prosorer's Dilemma is a game often used in organizations to exemplify how people react and the decisions they make when facing adversity.
The game shows the way two rational persons are not able to cooperate in a solution when that would be the best way to help each other.
The basis of the game was developed by Melvin Dresher and Merrill Flood in 1950.
What is illustrated by the Prisoner's Dilemma is the following. The results for each player in the game are uncertain if they are not able to communicate. Each player in the game ends up with results that depend on the other player's action. Both players would be better off if they could only agree on which action to take.