Answer:
She is finding slide task more difficult than pop up
Explanation:
The left inferior parental lobule is linked with tracking differences in perspective, by age 4 children have gain mastery in perspective task. children.
The left interior parental lobule is activated during perspective task to identify difference present in the task.
When the part of the brain is showing greater activities or means the part of the brain is more engaged and its really taking her time and energy identifying the slide. The task seems more difficult than pop.
Answer: learned helplessness
Explanation:
Research done by psychologist indicate that when people feel out of control or that they can not control what is happening in their lives they have a tendency of giving up and accepting that it is their fate that these things are happening to them.
What Is Learned Helplessness?
Learned helplessness is a result of a subject being constant exposed to an aversive stimulus in which they are not able to escape. Over time the subject will accept this stimulus and adopt a helpless approach towards it in such that when presented with a chance to escape they will feel helpless to accept those opportunities.
The woman who has been exposed to an abusive relationship feel helpless that she can't not escape her fate in such that she can't even take a chance that may bring her relief.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
Consideration dimension of leadership, is a type of leadership whereby the leader does not only care of the task at hand,or only concerned of the productivity of the employee, it also cares for the employees well being and personal issues, such as Susan in the passage above.
What make this attribute a consideration type of leadership is the help she rendered to her subordinate on a personal issue,this not not show task related concern or productivity of the employee, it explains her care and understanding she about work productivity.
Yes Option C is the best answer
Increasing numbers of people no longer view the safety of their neighbor- hoods as the sole responsibility of the police. Throughout the world, citizens in areas plagued by crime and violence are uniting to work with local gov- ernment. Together, they have the knowledge and resources to identify and remove the sources of crime, drug use, and juvenile delinquency in their communities.
Developing and sustaining these partnerships requires strong local leadership from mayors, city managers, city planners, and other elected local officials. This monograph was prepared to help create that leadership by chronicling how local public officials have used community safety partnerships to build healthier communities.
A framework for using community-local government partnerships to reduce crime now exists based on the experiences of public officials in North America, Europe, Africa, and Australasia. This framework includes the following:
• Recognizing crime and safety as a quality-of-life issue.
• Working across jurisdictional boundaries.
• Recognizing the crucial role of political leadership.
• Developing tools and measures of success that involve the community and victims of crime.
The programs examined in this monograph illustrate that this framework works best when adapted to the specific needs of a community. Good gover- nance requires that mayors and other key local officials develop the capaci-
