Answer:
True
Explanation:
The internal rate of return defines that return in which the net present value is zero that means the initial investment is equivalent to the present value of the yearly cash flows after considering the discounting factor
In other words we can say that the net present value is zero
Hence, the given statement is true
Answer:
A)equity theory.
Explanation:
From the question, we were informed that, if I'm a manager who made sure that rewards were distributed to my employees fairly based on their performance and that each employee clearly understood the basis for his or her own pay, In this case, I would be using equity theory. Equity theory, which is also known as Adams equity theory explained that a fair balance should exist between the input of an employee and the output, the input in this sense could be employee's skills, hardwork, the output as well could be the salaries, recognition given to employees. It should be noted that Equity theory allows to know how fair is the distribution of resources to relational partners.
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
Mediation is an alternative method of resolving conflicts, which has the intrinsic purpose of reaching the integral solution of a conflict between parties (they can be two or more people), thus avoiding reaching the judicial instance. The guiding principles that guide and implement mediation are: confidentiality, voluntariness, orality between the parties and full communication between them, the impartiality of the intervening mediator and the neutrality of the mediator regarding the matter brought into question.
It is based on democracy, social pacification, individual and social dialogue, respect, and consensus for coexistence. It consists of the intervention of a third party in a conflict, the mediator, in order to facilitate the rapprochement of the opposing parties and promote a negotiation process that allows reaching an agreement agreed and accepted by the parties that ends the conflict.
Based on the statement above, the courts will determine the
agreement to be likely as unenforceable and it is likely to be not voided. The agreement
is likely to be impossible to be enforced by the higher authorities thought it
is not voided or considered to be valid.
Answer: spoofing or phishing
Explanation: Spoofing is the act of concealing, as a known, reliable source, a communication from an anonymous source.Spoofing can be extended to emails, phone calls, and websites, or may be more sophisticated, such as an IP address spoofing device, Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) or Domain Name System (DNS) server.
Fraudulent sending of emails by reputable companies to force individuals to reveal personal information, such as passwords and credit card numbers.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the given case relates to spoofing or phishing.
