Answer:
The author learned when he was older
Explanation:
he is no longer considered a young teen when he learned
Answer: .
Vote, voice an opinion at a city council meetings, or write to an elected leader
Explanation:
The question is about how an Arizona citizen could influence local political decisions.
Option A about voting every 4 years during the presidential election will not affect the local political decision but rather affects federal decision since voting for the president is at the Federal level.
Option B is about voting, voicing an opinion at a city council meetings, or writing to an elected leader. This shows that the decision being taken here will influence local politics. Here, the decision affects the lowest level of government which is at the local level.
Option C about accepting that nothing can be done and try to avoid being frustrated about local issues is wrong. Everyone has to role to play in governance and doing this won't impact positively on the local politics.
Subscribing to a news app, and watching the presidential debates or share political news on social media isn't influencing local political decisions in Arizona.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
Answer:
The fire throws shadows on the floor that look like ghosts.
It is diverse with a lot of different ethnic back grounds and has al ot more than one race and traditions anyway there are a lot of different races and cultures
Answer:
A divided regional identity (with a bit of national unity) developed.
Explanation:
Politics: Some contributed (voting rights) to unity, others (nullification) clearly divided the country.
Economics: Market revolution was a bit of both but Tariffs and the clash between the industrial north and the agricultural south was dividing the country and contributed to a regional identity.
Foreign Policy: The war of 1812 united the country; the westward expansion was uniting and dividing at the same time.
As we take in account that Economics is always the most important thing for the general public, the regional identity grew more than the national unity did.
