Answer:
The answer is E- All answers are correct
Explanation:
Serfs in the middle ages were peasant farmers who provided manual labor in their master’s land who in return allowed them the right to cultivate certain fields within the manor in order to maintain themselves and were entitled to protection. As they worked a plot of land they were also required to work for the owner of the land (who was called the Lord of the Manor) It was a condition of debt bondage and indentured servitude. They were not allowed to leave the land they were bound to, if they did they would pay a fine. They were also required to pay an inheritance tax.
Some of their obligations included;
- Payment of taxes and fees in addition to their services.
- Payment of dues in form of labor in order to be able to use part of the Lord's field to generate their food and sustain themselves.
- Working the land a few days a week (at least three) and longer during special seasons like plantation and harvest.
This is usually true.
Most commonly the hero's quest archetype has a hero who starts off as a simple man or a boy with no specific heroic skills, but eventually he/she becomes heroic and valiant, improved version of the initial self.
Roleplay, psychodrama, simulation, and small/large group discussion is an effective ways to influence the construct of emotional transformation.
The multi-theory model (MTM) of fitness behavior alternate is a parsimonious theory that consists of cognitive, conative, and environmental empirically examined additives to initiate and keep fitness behavior trade.
Psychodrama is a based form of therapy in which a person dramatizes a personal hassle or conflict, generally in front of a group of different therapy contributors. The alternative members usually participate in the drama, even though every overall performance specializes in a single character's concerns.
A group discussion is a dialogue between a set of members on a given concern. A set discussion generally bureaucracy is a part of the choice manner utilized by corporations and academic establishments. The candidates communicate approximately the given topic to give facts, opinions, and conclusions.
Learn more about group discussion here brainly.com/question/2290843
#SPJ4
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
