Accountability involves determining who is responsible for actions taken. It is an obligation of a person or group to
account for their doings or activities. It is being responsible and to disclose
results in a manner which is transparent to everyone. It is also being
responsible for money or any property that is been entrusted.
The image is an example of how we interpret individual elements of a form and make them into a whole, which is a result of bottom-up processing.
<h3>What is bottom-up processing?</h3>
It should be noted that bottom up processing us the analysis that starts with the entry level before going to higher levels.
In this case, the image is an example of how we interpret individual elements of a form and make them into a whole, which is a result of bottom-up processing.
Learn more about processing on:
brainly.com/question/26642156
#SPJ1
1. The main conclusion of this argument is the increase in tractor-trailer rig accidents is due to driver inexperience.
2. The number of intermediate conclusions is one. They are first, graduates do not get enough hands-on training before receiving their driving certifications.
3. The number of basic reasons is Three. Firstly, There is a greater demand for truck drivers. Secondly, Driver training schools have shortened their courses, and lastly, Graduates do not get enough hands-on training.
4. The structure of the reasons for the main conclusion is linked.
- The Intermediate conclusion is the assertion that the remainder of the argument supports or that we are led to assume is true by the rest of the argument. The information provided in the second phrase serves to support this summarization of the first sentence's key idea.
- Linked premises also known as "connected" premises logically depend on one another and cooperate to establish a conclusion; in other words, they depend on one another. One of the dependent premises is frequently indicated by the argument's context rather than being stated directly. Enthymemes, or "hidden premises/assumptions," are what are known as these hidden premises.
Learn more about conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/11616885
#SPJ9
Answer:
cognitive dissonance theory.
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance theory: This theory refers to a situation that involves a clash in the beliefs, attitudes, and behavior of an individual.
Example: A person smokes instead of knowing that smoking causes cancer.
If there is any inconsistency that occurs in the behavior and attitude of a person then cognitive dissonance occurs. And to remove dissonance, the attitude and behavior of a person must be similar.
He was <span>mutually jealous, and suspicious of any central taxing authority. hope that helps :D</span>
