Answer and Explanation:
a. Since an american buys a sony tv so it would decrease the net exports as we know that net exports would be determined by deducting the imports from exports. Here the sony is an import so if an import is increase the net export would decrease
b. As the american purchase a sony stock share so it would increase the net capital outlow as the financial asset and stock would be shown in the capital account. as the money is given to sony so it would increase the net capital outflow
c. Sine the Japanese car would build a factory in Ohio so it decrease the net capital outflow as it is an imported good
d. As German citizen purchase an apple computer so it would rise the net exports as export would increase
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Risk identification.
Explanation:
Risk identification is one of the steps used in the risk management process. Risks are determined through the measurement of the parameters that define them, the size of the loss or possible damage, and the possibility that the loss or damage eventually takes place.
Answer:
The correct answer is c) undifferentiated targeting strategy.
Explanation:
An undifferentiated targeting strategy considers all possible buyers within the same reference group, which means that it does not determine specific conditions of a group of consumers to target it. Traditional marketing bases its strategy on the differentiated market, after in-depth studies about people's motivations, tastes, needs, etc. In this case Laelle does not use a specific strategy for the children who are supposed to be the main consumers, since for them it is indifferent if it is a child or adult who consumes their products.
Answer:
Explanation:
The firm Should decrease the output.
Because as we see selling price P is LESS than Marginal Cost (MC) and in perfect competition P=MC for efficient allocation . So By decreasing output firm can decrease MC ⇒ which leads to output where P=MC.
Answer:
Devil’s advocacy
Explanation:
Devil’s advocacy is a thorough analysis of a preferred alternative to check and test its strengths and weaknesses before being implemented with the purpose of identifying all the faults that might make the preferred alternative unacceptable.
This method helps in determining the dangers of any action taken by an individual or group of persons.
