Answer:
It increases peoples' knowledge about cultural differences, awareness, and communication.
Explanation:
Answer:
Visual Uniformity – Having every employee dressed to the standards of the dress code will create visual uniformity which helps customers identify employees and subtly promotes the impression of 'being a team' among the whole workplace.
Explanation:
1) A dress code promotes a more serious school atmosphere which emphasizes academics and promotes good behavior.
2) Dress codes have proven to increase student achievement by encouraging students to concentrate more on their studies and less on their wardrobe. A de-emphasis on clothing can also save money, as there will be less pressure to keep up with expensive trends and fashions.
3) Dress codes in school settings reduce social conflict and peer pressure that may be associated with appearance.
4) Studies indicate that a school dress code can reduces the prevalence of certain behaviors which are often expressed through wardrobe such as violence or promiscuity.
5) As opposed to uniforms, dress codes still allow students to wear what they want which leaves students with a sense of choice and expression.
I dont know if my answer is right or not but is it shallow?
Answer:
a. tasks make high-skill demands on employees.
Explanation:
A Total Quality Management program can be defined as an approach used to improve flexibility, effectiveness and competitiveness within an organization.
The philosophy of this approach contains a system that encompasses the organization as an integrated and consistent system, with the participation of people grouped in multifunctional teams, focused on improving management, customer service, training and development that will lead to the continuous improvement of organizational processes. .
Therefore, among the alternatives presented, the one that least fits as a factor that can negatively influence the success of a TQM program is that the tasks demand a lot from the employees, because one of the focus of this approach is the development of skills and abilities of employees in order to generate continuous improvement also of the company's human capital, essential to contribute to the objectives that will generate total quality.
Table/indexed.
Let's look at the three options and see what their advantages and disadvantages are:
Contiguous - In this scheme, the file is stored in contiguous blocks of the disk. It allows for easy random access of the data, but requires a contiguous sequence of blocks large enough to handle the entire file. Since the size of the file specified in this question varies quite a bit over it's lifespan, you're either going to be wasting a lot of space by having an allocation large enough to handle the maximum sized file, or the file will need to be copied whenever it grows and "bumps" into a file that was allocated after it. Because of this, this method is not the best.
Linked - The file is stored as a single, or double linked list of file blocks. This allows for the file to grow or shrink as needed, using only the amount of space needed for the file. Unfortunately, this storage scheme doesn't allow for random access of the file contents and the file can only be accessed sequentially. The question for this problem doesn't specify how the file is being accessed, so as long as random access isn't required, then this would be a reasonable allocation scheme. But I'm assuming that random access will be required, in which case, this scheme isn't ideal.
table/indexed - In this scheme, some disk blocks are used as tables to point to other disk blocks that actually contain the file data. It's almost as fast as contiguous allocation for random access of the file contents, yet allows for the growth and shrinkage of a file like linked allocation. As such, it handles all use cases at a relatively minor cost in total storage required. So this would be the most appropriate allocation scheme since the file access behavior wasn't specified in this question.
