Here is the answer of the given question above:
<span>Rousseau's ideas originated from the early, primitive condition of man. </span>Dennis Dedirot earned the Masters Degree in Philosophy in 1732 and that Gibbons determined that facts are not sufficient enough, and they needed more facts to stand for each other.
Answer:
I think the central idea of the passage is that the family Otzi's father is common in Europe.
Explanation:
My justification for my answer is that his DNA kind of matched the one of the people living in the Neolithic Age. This shows that maybe he was a descendant of those people.
I think the first answer is wrong because people of the Neolithic Age were from the past and I don't think DNA existed by then.
And the think the second is wrong because his mother's family was just rare it wasn't complex.
Finally the last is wrong because the DNA wasn't so hard to test it was also easy to compare it because there were other samples to be compared with.
That leaves us with the last answer as correct.
HOPE IT HELPED
Answer:
C. episodic
Explanation:
Alessandro is an 80-year-old man. He seems to have little memory of his wedding, anniversary celebrations, his children's birthdays, and their graduation ceremonies. However, he explicitly remembers all the details about the Second World War. It is evident that Alessandro has suffered losses in his <u>episodic</u> memory.
Episodic memory is an individuals personal memory of everyday activities throughout his/her life such as wedding anniversary, children birthdays, etc.
This is contrary to semantic memory which is a memory of things that are of common knowledge such as wars, epidemics.
Answer:
The answer to this question is Social Class
Explanation:
Social class refers to a group of people within a society who possess the same socioeconomic status.
The people who "hang out" in this bar can be referred to as a social class because they possess similar social status.
Hence answer is Social class
Answer:
A) House members have less voters to appeal to so they are harder to defeat than Senators.
Explanation:
House members have less voters to appeal to so they are harder to defeat than Senators. House districts are an average of 750,000 people so House members can be more connected to their constituents compared to a Senator who represents and entire state.