Answer:
Option d (inattentional blindness) is the right approach.
Explanation:
- Inattentional or Unintentional blindness, sometimes recognized as optical blindness, seems to be an occurrence in which the afflicted participant can not see new objects in their visible spectrum that unexpectedly arise.
- This occurrence is thought to have become a consequence of intense stimulation throughout the field and may cause the individual throughout their proximity to miss significant, however unpredictable, objects.
The other options given weren’t connected to the example mentioned. So, the best option would be the one above.
Answer:
Good question!
The first two questions are very similar. "What should I call you?" is more polite than asking "What can I call you?" but the meanings are the same. These questions are much less common than "What is your name?"
"How can I call you?" is the way you might ask someone for their phone number. "How can I call you," is similar to "How can I get in touch with you?"
If you'd like this to be explained in Spanish, just ask!
The following 3 options are all correct:
Congress makes laws, the President can veto them, and if brought before the Supreme Court, they decide its Constitutionality.
A series of checks and balances, thereby ensuring that no one branch gains too much power.
The President can offer up legislation, Congress can pass it, and the Supreme Court can determine whether it is Constitutional.
Looks right to me if that's what your asking, I be happy to help if not.
We must first define Ethical and Moral Standards for Warfare.
For thousands of years, War was seen as a means to an end, the winner takes all, and a social consequence where the winner is allowed to loot and murder.
However, Abrahamic religions such as Islam, brought the concept of a proper code of conduct for Soldiers and rules on how to interact with an Army that had lost a war.
Today, in our modern world, the United Nations has its own charter and a governing body which oversees what it calls War Crimes and crimes against humanity.
The UN has a perfect set of charter and code of conduct which define the moral conduct that needs to be followed by soldiers nowadays.
However, after the United States use of torture in Iraq without any international pressure, it seems like not many nations are still willing to accept a globally codified war code of conduct.
