1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr402 [8]
4 years ago
7

Hi mates pls help me out its very urgent and it's a promotional exam . 1. calculate, correct to two decimal places:75.8753​

Law
1 answer:
alukav5142 [94]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

by the way you could have used the calculator's fix option....however

in two decimal place it would be 75.88,

You might be interested in
Assume that the U.S. Congress has passed a federal statute that is in conflict with a Wisconsin state constitutional provision.
vredina [299]

Answer: It is not.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution has a clause known as the Supremacy Clause that places the Constitution of the United States as well as all Federal law that are not in violation of the Constitution above State laws and Constitutions.

This is why Federal Voting rights were able to prevail over the State Constitutions in the South after the Civil War.  

For this reason, the Federal Statute enacted by Congress will take precedence over the Wisconsin State Constitutional Provision.

3 0
3 years ago
List the people involved in Carmela Coppilino’s death. Why is there a possible problem with her death certificate?
omeli [17]

This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"

Answer and Explanation:

1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".

2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.

3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.

4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.

5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride

6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.

7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.

8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.

8 0
3 years ago
ARE CHICKENS REPTILES???????
OleMash [197]

Answer: Technically Chickens are reptiles

Explanation:

Although chickens are very close  to mammals they are reptiles. Dinosaurs were reptiles birds are Dinosaurs and a chicken is a type of bird.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
TEXAS SERVANT GIRL MURDERS
kramer

Targeting girls, they could have poor relationships with women resulting in a feeling of revenge on the girls. The servant/slave aspect could be targeting black women as he's racist or because they're considered weaker and they can't fight back as easily (as slaves), or it's because people wouldn't care as much about them as they're only slaves. Murders = multiple cases, not feeling relieved from just one, likely pointing to mental illness. The Texan part likely just means he lives nearby.

Sorry if this doesn't help! I tried to just use common logic here ^^

5 0
3 years ago
Do you think that OJ Simpson had time to murder his ex-wife and Ron Goldman?
Ulleksa [173]
Yes because he is an athlete strong and capable.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between a solicitor, a barrister and a lawyer?
    7·2 answers
  • A primary election in which voters are required to identify a party preference before the election and are not allowed to split
    5·1 answer
  • 2. What does this sign mean?
    8·1 answer
  • was OJ Simpson ever convicted of murder in a court? What differences are there between the court where he was convicted and the
    8·2 answers
  • What can the government do to reduce juvenile delinquency?​
    15·1 answer
  • "How did the British reaction to the Colonists' protests change
    9·1 answer
  • New York college list​
    5·1 answer
  • Can a teacher threaten a student to slap in India?​
    14·1 answer
  • When meeting a candidate to become your lawyer for the first time, it is important to _____. a. Ask for a guarantee that you are
    13·2 answers
  • The first major piece of antitrust legislation was the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!