The reason for which Brinkmanship had been considered a bold, as well as, an aggressive idea would be:
<h3>What is Brinkmanship?</h3>
Brinkmanship is defined as the hunt towards a particular benefit by taking a risk instead of giving up. Brinkmanship is the practice of trying to achieve a profitable outcome by pushing dangerous events on the brink of an ongoing conflict.
This strategy is based on international politics, foreign policy, labor relations, modern military strategy, and high-profile cases.
The idea is considered an aggressive idea because it involves a greater and more dangerous level of risk i.e. "pretending an attack to take the enemy down.'
However, the idea is dangerous but it contains an advantage on the hand if it gets successful.
Thus, option C is the correct answer that is bluffing an enemy into thinking it would be attacked.
To learn more about Brinkmanship, refer:
brainly.com/question/807188
manufactured goods such as guns, metal cooking utensils, and cloth. Hope this helped <3
Churchill<span> claimed that the </span>Soviet Union did<span> not want a war, but to get the fruits of war and indefinite amount of expansion.</span>
