Answer:
You’d be hard pressed to find someone who would disagree that American politics are highly partisan. Partisanship has been on the rise since the 1970s, and the consensus among the media seems to be that political polarization has skyrocketed since the beginning of the campaign season for the 2016 presidential election.
But a new study from the Annenberg School for Communication does not support this popular belief. Professor Yphtach Lelkes and his research collaborators conducted a series of studies in 2014 and then replicated these studies in 2017, allowing them to compare levels of political polarization in America before and after Donald Trump was elected president. They found no increase in polarization, leading them to conclude that Trump has not made things worse.
“I’ve been studying polarization for a long time,” Lelkes says, “and elite discourse is arguably at its worst, which led us to theorize that partisanship would be worse since Trump took office. But we found that things really have not budged.”
The first of the three studies tested participants’ willingness to speak poorly of the other political party and their opposition of speech critical of their own party. The second study tested the extent to which participants desired to avoid members of the opposite party, even when participating in activities that were not related to politics. And the third study tested participants’ willingness to commit or condone intentional actions designed to harm members of the opposing party.
These studies certainly indicate that America is politically polarized — evidenced by a preference for media critical of the other party rather than one’s own, among other things — but the findings show no statistical difference between the levels of partisanship in 2014 and 2017. America is no doubt polarized; just not more so than it was before Trump entered the political arena.
“Trump is a symptom of polarization rather than a cause of it,” says Lelkes. “People voted for him because of the highly polarized environment we already lived in; he didn’t create that environment.”
In fact, Lelkes’ findings actually indicate that there’s been a decrease in how positively Americans feel about their own party. Regular Americans are seemingly dissatisfied with both the party they identify with and the party they don’t identify with. And as elites — like policymakers and media personalities — become increasingly extreme and partisan, those regular Americans might decide they don’t want anything to do with either party, or with politics in general.
Explanation:
Answer:
sales tax is a tax placed on things you buy. the tax is a percent of money that goes to the government when you buy a product.
Explanation:
If you have an item that's $100 and there's a 7% sales tax, then the money going to the government is $7. meaning you'd have to pay a total of $107 for the product
Answer:
Explanation:
According to my research on the different types of relationships that exist between two factors, I can say that based on the information provided within the question there is a positive-linear relationship between alcohol exposure during childhood and alcoholism. This type of relationship of direct proportionality where any change in one will cause a change in the other.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The correct answer is a speedy and public trial.
The 6th amendment guarantees a public and speedy trail for citizens accused of crimes. It also guarantees that the citizen will have the ability to have their case heard in front of an impartial jury. This means that a group of citizens, with no ties to the individual in question, will hear the evidence from both the prosecutor and defense lawyer in order to determine whether the person is innocent or guilty.
